Discussions

pamelajkok

Joined: Oct 2025
Subscription: Core

Lessons · Components of a Logical Reasoning Question

pamelajkok

Monday, Oct 27

Imagine being completely unbothered by the F bombs and other profanity, but upset over the use of "her" instead of "his" or "their." I can't even.

Lessons · There is Only One Right Answer Choice

pamelajkok

Monday, Oct 27

Since it seems like the profanity is being scrubbed from the content, at least in the Foundations module, I thought I'd flag it here, too. I hope you do remove it. :)

-15

Lessons · More Competing Hypotheses

pamelajkok

Saturday, Oct 25

Lots of great theories in this comment section on what could cause a correlation between increased cheese consumption and increased death by entanglement in bedsheets.

I'll throw out another one... What if people who eat cheese tend to drink wine while enjoying their cheese? If drinking wine before heading to bed puts one in a non-sober state, maybe they're more likely to end up tangled in their sheets?

Lessons · Predictions

pamelajkok

Saturday, Oct 25

It is shocking to read comments referencing what these videos used to say. Thank you for removing the "colorful language."

Lessons · You Try - French Novelist Colette

pamelajkok

Monday, Nov 24

I could hear J.Y.'s "who cares!" in my head when I read answer choice A. Haha!

LSAT

•

Thursday, Oct 23

pamelajkok

🙃 Confused

Help me understand why this answer is correct...

On PT110.S2.Q23, I had each conditional, contrapositive, and chain mapped out correctly; however, I still got the question wrong. I watched the video explanation, and I'm still stumped. I can't understand how any of the answers are correct, because they all seem wrong. The correct answer is E, and I see where ONE of the conditions (inspires revulsion -> threatening) is met; however, the answer choice includes the word "and," so, it seems like both conditions would need to be met? But the second condition (physically dangerous -> threatening) is NOT met--the correct answer explicitly says the monster is NOT physically dangerous. Can someone help me understand why E is still correct?

Lessons · Theory and Approach (Princ)

pamelajkok

Tuesday, Nov 18

Omg the comments on this lesson have me dying haha.

Lessons · Review (PSA)

pamelajkok

Tuesday, Nov 18

This is a great summary!

Lessons · [OPTIONAL] Lesson 3 - An Art Museum's Collection (PSAr)

pamelajkok

Saturday, Nov 15

I knew it was A or C but chose C because it felt like the part of Simpson's argument that stated why the museum was small was context. It seemed like the reasoning (or premise) to his conclusion that the size of the museum was appropriate was because it is an art museum and not an ethnographic museum designed to collect every style of every period. Thus, C, not A. #help

Lessons · Summary and Transition to PSA Questions

pamelajkok

Friday, Nov 14

"Logic Babies" haha! But dang... We have come a long way!

Lessons · Theory and Approach (WSE Non-Causal)

pamelajkok

Monday, Nov 10

This sounds so simple at face value. Can't wait to see how tricky the LSAT writers can be in this next section... lol

Lessons · You Try - Allergies in Children (S)

pamelajkok

Monday, Nov 10

As a mom of 4 young kids, I got this one right haha.

And can also confirm from the text, "[Younger children] will be exposed to more germs if they are in a large family as opposed to a small family. This seems quite reasonable. Children are gross. The more the grosser. That is a true fact."

Little germ factories for sure, but also little sweeties.

Lessons · You Try - Sunscreen and Skin Cancer (W)

pamelajkok

Monday, Nov 10

I knew A and C were wrong. I was pretty sure D was wrong. B felt wrong at first blush because I totally forgot about the 25 years mentioned at the beginning of the stimulus. E seemed like the best option, followed by D, although D seemed off. I chose E on my initial take and D in my blind review. I was totally stumped until I got to the explanation and it mentioned the 25 years, and then it made total sense to me. I guess I probably should have re-read the stimulus in my blind review haha, but I felt very confident in my understanding of the conclusion / question stem going into the blind review, so I didn't. Sigh.