In my freshman year of college, during the first week, I received a citation for underage drinking and a code of conduct violation from my school for the same incident. Although I hired a lawyer, went to court, and successfully got the charge dropped and expunged from my permanent record, I am still required to disclose both the code of conduct violation and the citation to schools. Has anyone had experience with a similar situation? Im afraid top schools will view me negatively due to these actions.
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
I wish 7Sage used the same visual format as LawHub. Im so used to the 7Sage one and find the Lawhub, font and all, to be so much harder to concentrate on
You don't get the real test back or get to see any of the questions again after the exam. LSAC could possibly reuse components of the exam later in the future, so they don't release the exam anymore.
How do you remember all of these low resolutions without writing it down?
Since and every are both sufficient indicators, however, why did JY choose to use the sufficient following "every" and not "since"?
How are we supposed to know it was a theory? Bc it was stated as a principle? I didn't choose D for Q. 24 because it was never stated anywhere that it was a. theory, so I canceled it out.
For D, wouldn't the "only" be a Group 2 condition. So since SEN is immediately after "only", wouldn't it be the necessary reading "LC → SEN"? How would this be the negated form JY explains?
Is there a simpler and less confusing way to solve a question like this?
Im a little confused on this one. I understood the two sufficient necessary on their own, but why did JY connect freewill to dep.? What gives it the ability to connect as a chain?
JY talking about Tesla in the 2010 not knowing how huge they would become is crazy.
How does one label if we physically cannot write on the question? I feel like it's so time consuming to write everything out. Switching the exam to computer was one of the worst things LSAC did
I originally was going to choose E, but the "before the wreck occurred" made me chose A. How do we know that they were aware it was a hazard BEFORE the wreck occurred? #help
Im confused on this definition of property. I thought of property as owning something, but in this question it's defined as: successfully achieve public purposes. What does this even mean??
#help #feedback
Ive never been more confused!! If the question says "...most seriously undermines the reasoning in the argument?", shouldn't our answer weaken what we were told in the passage? I feel like A makes sense, and does not undermine anything, but instead supports. I watched the explanation video 2 and i'm still so lost!! #help
Question two (PTF97 S3 Q04) confused me because the correct answer (C) says that "some bad writers can never become great writers", however in the passage, it says that"no one can become a great writer" since ones needs talent not just skill from being taught. So wouldn't this be correct if it said "ALL bad writers can never become great writers"? By saying some bad writers can never become great writers, doesn't it imply that some still can? But this cannot be true since the passage says "no one". #help
Schools will look at your best score. If you cancel the 161 (which is a pretty good score) they may assume it was lower. Also, no harm in showing your growth