nope nope nope nope LSAT writers should be fined for bullshit like this

anecdotally, with long answers like this, I always read from E to A because I find that the answers are usually the last one or near the bottom because the LSAT writers hate us

I'm very surprised only 2% of people chose D. I had a hard time ruling it out, although I did choose B

right but its not saying the airline. its saying the people who are scheduled to fly

2 star difficulty??? I don't even know what half the words mean

fyi, near the bottom of the page, it says "explain why you want to go this law school in particular." it should probably be "...want to go to this..."

#feedback

I got this right because it is the obvious answer. But if I have a flight scheduled and the weather is as shit as can be, if that plane is flying, so am I. I would guess almost everybody (more than 83%) is like this. So this seems like a stretch of an AC

When double the amount of people choose the wrong answer over the right one...

That is logical thinking in the real world and on real mountains. Not for the LSAC writers though...

As someone who hikes, the paradox makes complete sense because inexperienced (and often grossly unprepared) hikers rely on forest rangers to come to their aid if they need them.

So I figured without a rescue squad, less people would take the risk because no one would come get them. But then not seeing that in the answers flustered me...

How does removing the rescue squad increase the perceived risk?? I feel like the risk would seem lower because clearly there is no need for a rescue squad...

#help (Added by Admin)

D seemed so obvious in BR, I cannot believe I didn't choose it smh

Thinking nanobes have anything to do with single-celled creatures is a crazy assumption.

About AC C, "Maybe something else that is responsible for the phenomenon." yeah... like thermal insulating??? How can we not apply the same logic to AC E??

#help (Added by Admin)

how can you not exercise more but walk more? walking is exercise...

yeah that was the first thing I thought when I read "did not successfully complete." I was like, well I don't care how good or bad they did, it is irrelevant to the point.

I could not understand E for the life of me, but I knew as a fact it wasn't any of the other 4 answers.

what?? wouldnt that just mean he was also a cruel tyrant? why couldn't Caligula copy what other tyrants did?? and that's why they are similar... all of the other AC's are also very wrong but this one is too.

#help (Added by Admin)

didn't know animal, mammal, and creature are all the same... wtf

me reading "old" instead of "new" in AC E... read carefully!

lower case gang

yeah exactly. B was great until I read performance. if I'm Max Verstappen, is hearing one side of a phone conversation gonna detract from my performance? or even if im an unfazable NYC taxi driver, my performance is second nature.

such a huge assumption gap

tbh I preferred when J.Y was aggressively yelling into the mic lol

#feedback These explanations are just too long and too complicated/complex. in the v1, it was so much easier to follow and not get lost nor lose focus.

J.Y last lesson: "only if"? no. definitely wrong. stop reading

J.Y this lesson: "only if"? perfect. correct answer. spot on

I immediately wrote off A because all it does is just restate the phenomenon. It does not affirm or support the hypothesis that more exposer to kids and germs = less allergies.