As someone who hikes, the paradox makes complete sense because inexperienced (and often grossly unprepared) hikers rely on forest rangers to come to their aid if they need them.
So I figured without a rescue squad, less people would take the risk because no one would come get them. But then not seeing that in the answers flustered me...
How does removing the rescue squad increase the perceived risk?? I feel like the risk would seem lower because clearly there is no need for a rescue squad...
#help (Added by Admin)
D seemed so obvious in BR, I cannot believe I didn't choose it smh
Thinking nanobes have anything to do with single-celled creatures is a crazy assumption.
2 star difficulty??? I don't even know what half the words mean
What do robots have to do with anything??? Why not assume that the Mars exploration will be carried out by dogs or aliens or plants... how is that possibly a reasonable assumption left out. Why would that ever be a premise to that conclusion.
About AC C, "Maybe something else that is responsible for the phenomenon." yeah... like thermal insulating??? How can we not apply the same logic to AC E??
#help (Added by Admin)
how can you not exercise more but walk more? walking is exercise...
tbh I preferred when J.Y was aggressively yelling into the mic lol
I could not understand E for the life of me, but I knew as a fact it wasn't any of the other 4 answers.
I can't believe this was so long ago that Elon Musk was known as the former PayPal guy
fyi, near the bottom of the page, it says "explain why you want to go this law school in particular." it should probably be "...want to go to this..."
#feedback
what?? wouldnt that just mean he was also a cruel tyrant? why couldn't Caligula copy what other tyrants did?? and that's why they are similar... all of the other AC's are also very wrong but this one is too.
#help (Added by Admin)
#feedback These explanations are just too long and too complicated/complex. in the v1, it was so much easier to follow and not get lost nor lose focus.
Is there a difference between "most strongly supports the explanation" and "most strongly supported" questions?
Like, how do I know this is a strengthening question and not a MSS question?
#help
nope nope nope nope LSAT writers should be fined for bullshit like this
anecdotally, with long answers like this, I always read from E to A because I find that the answers are usually the last one or near the bottom because the LSAT writers hate us
didn't know animal, mammal, and creature are all the same... wtf
me reading "old" instead of "new" in AC E... read carefully!
J.Y last lesson: "only if"? no. definitely wrong. stop reading
J.Y this lesson: "only if"? perfect. correct answer. spot on
I immediately wrote off A because all it does is just restate the phenomenon. It does not affirm or support the hypothesis that more exposer to kids and germs = less allergies.
I got this right because it is the obvious answer. But if I have a flight scheduled and the weather is as shit as can be, if that plane is flying, so am I. I would guess almost everybody (more than 83%) is like this. So this seems like a stretch of an AC
if the majority of people choose the wrong answer, its a bad question
When double the amount of people choose the wrong answer over the right one...
I'm very surprised only 2% of people chose D. I had a hard time ruling it out, although I did choose B
Woody Allen an all-time hater