I would have said some cultivars of corn VS other cultivars of corn and the comparison is which look like sorghum.

I took the Jan 2025 LSAT for the first time too. Im not sure how I did. It was definitely hard but I thought it would be harder- which score wise, could go either way. I felt pretty good about the RC except the very last passage (which I felt was quite difficult in comparison and sounds like it was the experimental section) but at that point I was also mentally fried. I had accomodations so after 5 hours and 45 min I didnt have much gusto left. One of my LR sections I flagged a few questions I was hoping to return to but I didnt have time. I felt strangely calm about the whole process (albeit a bit tired towards the end). No idea how I did, but I'm thankful I got to go through the process, that alone is worth a pat on the back.

#feedback how does anyone do these within the timeframe? I can get the right answer but not in 2 min. It never happens.

I wish there were a way to adjust the timing to the accommodation one gets om the lsat.

ugh I would have got all 5 right but question 5- I moved from D to A. I thought choice A sounded like the first speaker- which the second speaker disagreed with. I always get the low-priority questions right. You know how insulting that sounds lol?!!

This sounds like math positive and negative correlation is the same as direct or inverse relationships.

Im liking the Dr Claw reference

for q3, i used the negate conditional and you chose to negate is as a some statement. Why? Even the answer used the same negate conditional

that I did.

when was BUT described as a conjunction?

Could you not have worked up to Question 2?!! Seriously, we are learning basic concepts and you slap this mammoth of a brain f*$@ at us. The notes are absolute rubbish and breaking this down. You literally walk us through EVERY example like were 5 and then skim over this?

For Question 1, I took the statement, If he synth LSD he CANNOT cook meth as a group 4, where the explination stated it as as Group 1 (If, then). Can you explain?

why cant I slow down this video?

I thought opposition leaders was the subject. I thought "the attempts" sounded like an action/verb

OOh, this was a good one. Im starting to understand

This is confusing how it is presented. Around the 3 minute mark you introduce the rules 1-4, then you say take the contrapositive afterwards. The contrapositive- rule 5 should actually be introduced as part of the rules 1-4 if its what WE SHOULD BE USING. Otherwise it seems like its optional like the other exercises. In fact it IS the contrapositive that is used in this to translate back to English- correct?

I found 3 confusing. The ONLY myths survived. I wrote it down as written down> myths survived. Because ONLY is an indicator of a necessary condition found on the right side of the equation

.