I think I could have gotten this right by POE if I understood the question stem to be a strengthening question. I skipped this one because I was unsure of what the stim was asking, at first I thought it was a flaw question and could not find anything in the AC's that was suited to my liking.

This feels more like a SA, strengthen question more than a weakening.

Did anyone else not know the definition of qualified? I thought my context clues were onto something..

I didn't even BR this one. CONFIDENCE BABY!

What is the difference between a claim and a premise?

I did think of this assumption first. Hell yeah.

So I have a practice text book I used to drill sometimes on my down time and I swear this question is in there but it is worded differently in a way that makes the distinction between the intrinsic brightness of a star and it's age. The wording is changed here to throw everyone off.. but reasonably I can see how we can still land on C.

Also having the same issue. It won't let me access any of the lessons under LR.

I always see a lot of discouraged comments, and I just want to share that this is all practice. I got this wrong during the first round because I did not understand the stim. But I took my time in BR and kept rereading the stim until I realized that if domesticated then -> domesticated now.

Once this clicked, the P-->C bridge formed itself.

That to say, don't be too hard on yourself and keep trying though it can be discouraging.

I was torn in between B and E. I thought B felt weak and the word indifferent was throwing me off because subconsciously I wanted to argue that the authors work was NOT indifferent. I picked E because it provided a strong explanation for why the charge was unfair (providing support to the conclusion)

Whereas I should have been thinking in the sense that "it does not have to be indifferent" meaning the author could care or could not care and therefore the argument has standing. The question stem is asking for us to find an assumption that is required for the argument to have standing.

I originally picked B but ended up picking E in BR. Thank you for drilling into me lol. I unfortunately keep falling for the OLDEST TRICK IN THE BOOK.

I debated a long time on this one between AC:A and AC:B and I seriously do not get why A is being ruled out. I feel like it is not as general as B but ultimately, they say the same thing imo. Can someone explain?

I'm so mad I changed this during BR simply because I doubted myself. I did this perfectly the first time.

I'm planning to take the test this coming August. I also work full time and in the beginning of the year I promised myself to squeeze in at least two hours a day and not to beat myself up when my brain needed a break. I finished the entire syllabus today and now that I am moving on to PT's I am aiming to keep the 2 hour a day goal, but to tackle each section in 35 minute parts so I can fit it into one day.

I mainly study on my down time during work or during a day I know will be busy I wake up early or push through after work. What helps me with this is I already have several friends in law school and it is okay to think that the work sucks and that you do not want to do it. You just have to commit to the investment and still see it through.

Hope this helps. :)

This was a really good lesson.

This is the only question out of the hardest ones that made sense to me lol. The prescriptive rule helped me the most!

I originally picked B but ended up going with D in BR. This was my thought process behind it:

I always thought of the term "hence" as a premise indicator (I feel like it changes depending on the context of the sentence). But this led me think that the main point of the economists argument as taxing consumption would encourage savings rates.

Considering that, it only made sense to pick D because it is the only AC that mention taxing consumption and it logically follow the economists argument that the government should focus on taxing consumption rather than income to promote savings.

Hope this helps somebody!

I really liked this video. :)

I was 25 secs to slow. But slay

I also got this correct and my strategy during BR was simply to rearrange to structure of the answer choices to match the stim. I initially picked A. Admittedly, during BR I did not eliminate A for the reason JY mentions, but AC:E seemed to match the stim without as much uncertainty so I went with that.

I picked AC:E here the first round because I had the same assumption JY had. I wrote it out during BR and figured out it was AC:C through BR

This took me 3 minutes... but I did it perfectly lol

I ATE this question

I really like the segments where we phrase the correct answer in different ways. It helps

Proud to say I got to AC:A in the way JY highlighted lol

But I also did understand the stim

WHY IS THE DROP DOWN MISSING FOR TWO LR SECTIONS AND 1 RC??? WHY ARE THE PT'S NOT OMMITTING LOGIC GAMES????

I am frustrated because this offset my score because I didn't do the games. #ADMIN, can someone help or explain what's going on so this can be fixed?