The way the question was worded was absolutely atrocious

If youve ever driven in rush hour, youd know the difference" --

me: They take a different route?

Him: Driving slower means less accidents (:

Me: assumption

I would review the preptests to see whats going wrong. Maybe your just really worried while taking the preptest because you dont want to see 160 again and you're not able to focus entirely on the questions (Maybe take it untimed to see if its that). You should check to see if the issue is something youve worked on in the past but maybe have stopped because you got better at it. Maybe just revisit things that used to stump you. Sometimes taking a day away is helpful too - I included the other two first because I know I personally wouldnt be able to stop studying when the test date is close.

The scientists: Wow they just keep the same system

Me: yeah you destroyed their vision????

Really love these overviews. I Star them every time. Makes it easy to review after learning other passage types!

One thing that works for me for RREs is asking a question:

Exp. Why do we want to replace effective Electric Zappers with birds?

Why is detective Conan considered good with a 10% solving rate?

This is incredible!

If you have live, I highly recommend the LSAT Course: Causal Reasoning (Foundational). They go over this and give it an acronym CREA. It's really helpful

You can have it. It just needs to be blank and they may ask to see it. Proproctor does more tests than just lsat so that may be why it says that.

#feedback please try to update questions with a review video of the whole class. Often it isn't very helpful to me and is super long for not much more understanding, especially when its a high difficulty rated question

For question review videos, can it not be a 20 minute group video reviewing the question? It's really annoying to try to parse through the video looking for an explanation.

At first I did not understand how Question 1 was an argument. Until seeing that the first sentence states it can obtain dates for sites up to 200K years old. This is a limit. In the next sentence we state that it can obtain accurate dates from 1Mil years in colder regions. There is a clear discrepancy between these two conclusions, since it's the same technique. The evidence provided is that the decomposition rate is slower in colder climates.