is anyone else struggling with this section more than the others? particularly with parsing what the stimulus is even saying. anyone have any tips on how to recognize the causal links quicker?

LMFAO youre so real for that

LMFAO

me too lmao. it's a learning process!

did anyone else have a hard time even understanding what the stimulus meant? anyone have any tips of how to understand stimulus' with more abstract, layered concepts like this one?

in real test settings yes, but during practice i think blind review AFTER selecting your answer is really important. which includes analyzing the rest of the stimulus, because it doesn't just explain why the other answers are wrong but how they're specifically wrong

I also did. It makes sense that we interpreted D as an assumption because of its use of "always uncomfortable," but that's what the creators WANTED us to fall for. Although you can identify it's the wrong answer, it is still important to recognize WHY it's wrong. As said in the video, it's not wrong because of the assumption it's making, but rather it mistakenly identifies the wrong modifying agent.

As for B, the assumption I fell for was the sufficient and necessary conditions, but actually, this assumption isn't correct because it is made based on entirely separate circumstances (in the case in which second opinions are necessary), which at no point is that assumed in the stimulus.

Hopefully this helps? I think explaining it helps my understanding better since I also made the same mistake you did.

can someone please explain the last argument about harry potter and draco malfoy? I'm confused as to whether this lesson is saying it is a valid or invalid argument.

can you please explain this?

More drills — the application of newly learned concepts mixed with old concepts is a good way to learn #feedback

/