I clearly cant cut cookies

It got me lol

For question number two we have to start with the killing of either Bran or Robb, because it is a group two indicator "must" making it a necessary condition.

What I still struggle with is placing Sansa in the chain. Any tips?

#feedback

I am having a very hard time with the double necessary negation in this question. Is it possible to work through the first statement a little slower or recommend another video where this is explained in detail?

How can we drill these?

Number 2 is sooo much harder if you start with not killing Rob. It leaves Sansa out there doing nothing because like you said "not both" does not mean will be one.

This has to be a 5 star question

What I don't understand in number one is why we didn't negate necessary here, "If he synthesizes LSD, then he cannot cook meth" Please help

#feedback

Is this correct?

Negate Sufficient: Negate both

Negate Necessary: Negate one

#feedback

For number 3 I thought that "the only" was a sufficient indicator word. The tricky one

Does this resolve the example?

A and /B → C

/C→/A or B

#help

How are we identifying what is sufficient and necessary in these statements? It seems like we are just reading left to right.

English:

Some almonds are grown in California. Some produce grown in California is properly categorized as a fruit. Therefore, some almonds are properly categorized as a fruit.

Lawgic:

A ←s→ B ←s→ C

A ←s→ C

#help

My issue is with linking conditionals. Making the assumption that Almonds → Produce and Produce ←s→ Almonds is a simple connection to make here because this is an introductory level fact pattern, but in disciplines that I am unfamiliar with this is extremely difficult!

When do we exponent the specific why isn't it aP? What would the question need to look like to be aP? I'm not looking for an explanation of:

All cats are black. Max is a cat. Thus, Max is black.

C→B

mC

_

mB

I understand that. I'm losing the plot in complex applications

I want to hear success stories from individuals from underserved communities with challenges

Not motivating if we dont know the original score.

Someone send this man a cat

I really need help with Lawgic. Does anyone have any suggestions? I take the LSAT in October and can't get a handle on it. I can't even identify the statements to apply it to.

#feedback

I know this is late in the lessons to suggest this, but deviating from the A,B,C lawgic annotations is wildly distracting. Translating to personal word choices takes the skill builder lessons from the prescribed 30 min to much much longer.

This is pretty jarring material. The lessons progress so slow and steady but then bam! linking conditional statements goes from intro to experienced in 4.3 min. one lesson.

I have lost so much valuable time from the disassociation this has caused. Please improve this section. It would be manageable if this was the expected pace of the course, but this progression is so out of pocket

Thank you in advance Kevin.

My toxic trait is thinking i can do the LSAT without lawgic because I get the right answers through reasoning and go over time if I use lawgic. I blame F*ing Pat

I am getting these correct...mostly. What scares me is that these questions range from 140-157 difficulty range

"...D is a very absurd answer choice." Okay. Cries in 160

This is not motivating for individuals who come from backgrounds that dont allow an additional year of study. This was extremely discouraging, but happy for Lauren. Congratulations Lauren