Subscription pricing
I'm familiar with "some" and "most" and "many" and whatnot, but I've just encountered a question where it seems like "few" doesn't really match up to the way "some" works.
If anyone has an answer, I'd love a tip!
PT Questions
tteokkim
- Joined
- Sep 2025
- Subscription
- Free
tteokkim
Monday, Oct 27 2025
skimming really is my worst enemy... "much as" doesn't mean "as much as" T_T
tteokkim
Wednesday, Oct 08 2025
@RyanAlexander your excitement is so tangible LOL the lsat definitely becomes 100x more fun when you actually know some trivia inside it
i had a similar experience with a question about a species of dragonfly and crawfish since i'm a huge animal nerd
tteokkim
Monday, Oct 06 2025
how do you know when to not combine?
i got this wrong because i mapped it out like this:
LN -m-> sell rasp to comm. + sell only DF
tteokkim
Friday, Oct 03 2025
@rc39 the quantifier words help identify the scope of the conditional. your if/then statement is your conditional, but the quantifier just specifies how often it occurs, or how much of any group is included within the conditional.
the statement "some unicorns don't poop rainbows" is a conditional statement, but the quantifier itself is not a conditional.
tteokkim
Tuesday, Sep 23 2025
Cats of which you can adopt from a shelter located directly in the middle of a cul-de-sac or buy directly from a breeder of which whose abilities and-slash-or moral codes are questionable are generally lactose intolerant contrary to popular belief and will probably poop their pants if given any form of dairy including milk, cheese, and yogurt.
Man this question was a really weird ballbuster for me.
My question is with the “cognitive faculty” definition and the “view” in question. Would the view be a combination of “human having superior cognitive faculty” and “not being able to be gratified upon realization?” I chose answer A, that other animals are capable of rational communication under the impression that it violated the view that humans had superior cognitive faculty—rational communication being a “superior cognitive faculty.”
Is there any way I can look out for this mistake on other questions, as I think this is a very question/theme-specific type of mistake?