damn answer choice b was such a good trap...

I was still really confused about how C was wrong and tried to summarize what the other comments were saying and finally got it. hopefully this helps others:

AC (C) is wrong because it only talks about what was happening before, but doesn't address the level of apprehension now. while the stimulus says that the "odds of apprehending" have greatly increased, it doesn't mean that they actually increased. even if it did, AC C doesn't EXPLAIN why there was a dramatic decrease in auto thefts, only that there was one.

wow that's amazing.. congrats! what's 1 thing you would suggest someone do in their studying journey?

this is bs...

wtf...

the ending gagged me

ngl i think the reason why im having so much trouble understanding this question is because its a shit argument

bruh...

hi kevin

lmao what? this question broke my brain. i didn't even know what the stimulus was trying to argue

ugh... im so done with this section. the "steep" angle being good (less earthquakes) and "shallow" being bad (more earthquakes) was really screwing with my general understanding of the words steep and shallow, which is what got me to pick the wrong answers

if i get this type of question on my exam im giving up

my lack of understanding of chemistry and isotopes definitely contributed to my getting this question wrong... thanks, L ("outside knowledge is not needed") SAT

i hate this question....

this is the funniest lsat question i've seen fr

this question.....