Hi guys. I used 7sage for five months (no other learning programs). I started with a 164 baseline score and I am so so so excited to be able to share that I got a 180. I cried when I saw. I never expected this. Thank you so much 7sage could not have done it without you guys. Hope everyone else's October tests went well. It has been a stressful ride for me. Not gonna lie this is just a celebration post for me since no one in my life understands the significance of this! I will answer questions if anyone wants to know anything about my study process.

Hey guys, I need feedback on the following. I took the June LSAT and scored a 157, I studied since then and was scoring in the 170s in my practice tests. An hour before taking the October test I found out about the whole hacking situation and how that test would be much harder. As a consequence (I'm diabetic), my sugar was low throughout the entire test affecting my concentration. Although that could've affected my score I am shocked on how low I scored. What do you guys think I should do?

I have a hard time prephrasing. In some live classes we do pre phrases before going into the AC's. But I was thinking that it would be good to have a class that focuses a bit more on prephrasing and how to actually prephrase correctly.

Hello - I'd be curious to see what the accuracy is for tags based on difficulty. For example my current accuracy for CondR is 75% overall, but I'd like to see what percentage accuracy I have for each levels 1-5.

Hey everyone!

This is the timeline of my LSAT journey:

May 2024-began studying (poorly, didn't take it very seriously)

Aug 2024-official score 142

*Haven't touched the LSAT since*

Sept 2025-started studying again

Oct 2025-first PT 156

Ok so realistically, what are my chances of scoring a 165 in the Jan 2026 LSAT? I'm still struggling with some basic stuff like making sufficient/necessary mistakes, spending way too much time on questions, overthinking, etc. I'm not confident whatsoever and the 14 pt increase is the only thing keeping me going. I just want to know what my chances are, any advice is appreciated.

Dear crew:

I would like to start out that I enjoy working on all types of RC passages and prefer to work on the hardest. Science and law passages are my most favorite. But there is ONE passage type that is an absolute disaster for me in terms of the # of missed questions, and applying the study advice is making it worse. -The jargon rich medical passages.

I am supposed to pay attention to the structure of the passage, do my lo-res summaries and not memorize the medical lingo. Yea. That's not working for me. If I do attempt to memorize the medical terms I do bad, if I don't I might as well not even bother.

At this point I fear I will have to just hope one of this monsters does not appear on the test and I hate to leave anything to hope.

Does anyone have any advice? Anything I could try?

Please help me slay the beast! 🙏🏼

Thank you.

How often do analytics update? I did around 40 questions in the past 24 hours but no change in my analytics -- this includes no changes in the percentage and the questions taken. But when I check my drill history, the questions are there. Do analytics update at a specific time daily? Can you change it so that it update in real time?

I also noticed that the ones not included tend to be my 1-3 question drills. 10+ questions at a time update normally.

Hi I did not do good. I got a 147. I am retaking in January of 2026. I want to improve my score within 2 months. I studied from June until October.

Hi! Today has been a bit of a gut punch. I've been full-time studying since May, PT’d a 169, 170, 176 and 171 leading into October, but got a 167 on the October exam. My GPA is a 3.93 and my dream school is Georgetown. I ideally would like to be competitive for the T-14s even though I’m open to T-30 schools. I know law school applications are at a high and applying at the end of November vs end of October can be detrimental.

Do I drop everything, hunker down, and take the November exam (I scheduled it for backup) or take my chances with what I have now to be able to apply earlier?

I appreciate any advice! ❤️

Hi everyone,

I'm currently due to be taking the November LSAT here soon but I am at least 5 points off of where I want to be at the low/mid 160s with a 3.7 GPA. Will I be screwing myself over by taking the January LSAT and looking to apply this cycle? I'm not looking for T30 or even T80. Just want some opinions if the score boost will be worth the later applications.

Thanks

Hey

I got a 152 on my Oct LSAT unfortunately and I’m looking for advice. Do I try again in January for a score boost or do I apply next cycle. I’m applying in Canada so most apps are due on the 1st of Nov. my apps are done and my undergrad I’m currently in is Engineering. Is it worth doing a masters/ work experience then revisiting law school after or try to push myself for the January one

I’m looking for I guess things to do differently if I am writing in Janurary. Is it worth it to try especially when it will be a blind score being attached to my applications. I was scoring consistently 160 on Pts leading up to it so I don’t know what happened tbh.

I’m just upset with myself so any help would be extremely appreciated, I also don’t know if I should cancel my score or not or leave it.

I just took a prep test and majority of the questions I got wrong are assumption questions. These are so hard to understand and I need help.

How often do the priorities under analytics update? And is it based on full PTs, sections or drills? Or a combination?

My accommodation request was denied and now LSAC says my account is on hold for registration.. I am stressed as I only have two days I can write the exam and hope to take it online (this is for the November 2025 testing)

I've emailed accommodations and have had no response.... help!

Essayist: The historical figures that we find most engaging are very rarely those who are morally most virtuous. What most commonly distinguishes them is their bravery and creativity. Thus, moral virtue is not among the characteristics that we admire most, since the people whose lives we would most like to live are those with characteristics we admire most.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the essayist's argument?

A) The historical figures that we find most engaging are those lives we would most like to live.

B) Bravery and creativity are characteristics that makes it more difficult to be morally virtuous.

C) Historical figures are very rarely morally virtuous.

D) People develops their conception of what makes an individual admirable based on what they know about historical figures

E) Moral virtue is the characteristics of historical figures that we find least engaging.

Why is the correct answer A and not B?

I am just really nervous for the November LSAT. I have been studying a lot but I can never shake the nervous feeling.

I have been studying for the LSAT for a while and am seeking to study with a small group of people that I can view as accountability partners. I want to be able to walk through each question to explain why each right answer is right and why the wrong answer is wrong. I feel as if I have hit a plateau, and I want to take the necessary steps to break through to my goal score.

Currently, I am testing in the mid to low 160's and have an end goal of reaching the high 160's or lower 170's. I understand the fundamental principles and have been working to get my accuracy as high as possible, as that is the only way to score in the higher range.

I am open to a virtual or in-person group; I am based in Austin for college and will be in Houston once I graduate.

Is anyone located in Montréal and interested in forming a study group?

I came across a question that said something along the lines of "In a survey 60% of participants said yes and 40% said no" and the conclusion was "This shows more people believe yes than no" (Granted the question was much more nuanced and another flaw was present but thats besides the point of my question).

One of the ACs said "They draw a conclusion about the population in general based on only a sample of the population"

Even though I got this question correct because I saw the other flaw in the argument, the AC above was wrong which confused me because the explanation why it was wrong specifically said "there is nothing inherently flawed about drawing a conclusion from a sample. What would be flawed is relying on an unrepresentative sample".

Does this mean that if it said "We surveyed NYC, here are the results, therefore more people say yes than no" would be correct? or is it incorrect because it included information regarding the sample. In the question above there was no information regarding how the survey was conducted or who was a part of it but, they still made a generalization of the population from whatever sample they surveyed.

On PT110.S2.Q23, I had each conditional, contrapositive, and chain mapped out correctly; however, I still got the question wrong. I watched the video explanation, and I'm still stumped. I can't understand how any of the answers are correct, because they all seem wrong. The correct answer is E, and I see where ONE of the conditions (inspires revulsion -> threatening) is met; however, the answer choice includes the word "and," so, it seems like both conditions would need to be met? But the second condition (physically dangerous -> threatening) is NOT met--the correct answer explicitly says the monster is NOT physically dangerous. Can someone help me understand why E is still correct?

anyone else just get screwed over? was low in que on time, got in picked sat and my time went to complete and site crashed. had to go back in... site crashed again... got back in and only had 4:45 for the 7th available. Absolutely got f'ed over.

I am writing the LSAT in November. I was on a pretty good trajectory until this week. I am drilling causal reasoning and getting most wrong. I do not know what is going on. I go on the lives for CR, and at the time seem to understand, and then I drill and I am still stuck. Any ideas? What the heck am I not getting - rhetorical question, Ha! Anyone feeling like this?

To be fair, I have heard great things about 7Sage for a long time, but Kevin Lin is the reason I'm here. I'd really like to take a class that he is confirmed to be teaching. Tutoring would be great too, if possible. Can anyone advise?

Can a feature be added where we can filter questions for our drill based on if they were done a while ago (i.e. over a month ago)? Like if I am running out of questions for a certain question type, it would be great for the drill to select any fresh questions i have and then pick any seen/answered questions that were not recent (so there's less of a chance of doing them recently and remembering the right answer). Thanks!

Hello! I've been thinking about this for a while, but it would be helpful to create a custom review set. For example, I'm trying to review all of the questions I got incorrect the first time and got correct in blind review to see my conceptual gaps. The only problem is to see my "actual take" and "blind review" answer choices, I have to go all the way to "review" for the Preptest the question came from. For single question from a drill set, that isn't really possible since I haven't done the whole exam or if I look for the drill set the question came from (hard when you've done so many questions). Otherwise, my only other option is to click on the magnifying glass or go to the explanations tab to review the question (which doesn't show my previous answer choices). Maybe there is a way to do this and I'm not aware - please let me know if that's the case! Thanks a bunch! :)