Discussions

All posts

New post

317 posts in the last 30 days

Hii I was hoping someone could help me out. I have been trying to log into Lawhub for weeks now and I am unable to. Every time I go into it, it just keeps reloading. I have tried on Chrome, Safari, Firefox, clearing my cache, clearing my history, allowing cookies, allowing block ups, trying to install on my laptop and nothing is working for me. I was wondering if anyone has had this issue? and if so, how did you resolve it?

Thanks!! :)

0

👥 Study Group Name: LSAT Study South Korea

🔢 I'm currently scoring: 165-170

📆 My planned test date: N/A

📈 To study, I have been: [finishing the CC, taking a PT twice a week, drilling, etc]: I am going through PT1-30 now.

🔑 My goals for this group are: [to hold each other accountable, to hear other perspectives, etc] We can discuss.

🔍 We'll focus on: [Reading Comprehension, Logic Games, Logical Reasoning, etc]. We will do all sections.

📚 When we'll meet and what we'll do: I can only do weekend. We can talk further.

✅ How to join: Send me a DM or comment below please.

2

Hey Guys!

We’re offering in-person classes in several cities across the U.S this fall! In these classes, the same group of students will follow a set curriculum under the guidance of a top-scoring 7Sage instructor. The curriculum is intended as a full introduction to all major aspects of the LSAT, and augments your own study of the core curriculum through direct instruction and review. Each class meets weekly for three hours, for 10 weeks beginning in September and ending in November, and includes a full study plan for you to follow during the course. Regardless of whether you are writing your LSAT this fall or in 2024, these classes are a great opportunity to meet with peers and master LSAT skills in a classroom setting!

The classes we are running this fall are located in:

New York City: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat-fundamental-nyc-in-person/

Los Angeles: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat-fundamental-los-angeles-in-person/

Dallas: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat-fundamental-dallas-in-person/

Chicago: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat-fundamental-chicago-in-person-2/

3

Is it just me that thinks Logic Reasoning is too long on here? To those who took the LSAT, did you skip through logic reasoning or some of it? I have been in it and still have not started Logic Games, should I wait until I finish logic reasoning first or instantly start going to logic game? (I am taking the October LSAT). Please comment!!

0

I was looking at the LR questions with the lowest correct answer rates and came across PT12 S1 Q24.

I picked A simply because the rest didn't make sense, but am confused why A is actually a flaw (as opposed to one that relies on the assumption that the Vinland Map wasn't also written by Gutenberg).

If the Vinland Map were also printed by Gutenberg, and we now know that Gutenberg was using this ink at the time, then it could be both likely that B-36 was printed by Gutenberg and that the Vinland Map is not a fake. None of that is inconsistent with the question stem.

So for A to be a flaw, we have to assume that the Vinland Map was not printed by Gutenberg. There is no evidence for that in the question stem. The only information we're given about the Vinland Map in the stem is that it was printed around the same time (the 15th century) as Gutenberg's works.

I get that it might be a reasonable assumption that the map wasn’t printed by Gutenberg, but feel like I’m missing something if a flaw can rely on an assumption that is not supported by the stem.

0

Hi everyone! I've been watching some RC live classes and in them JY makes two columns (structural and content) for low res summaries. When I've been doing tests, I've only been making one column which contains structural low res, although I find I never really look at it while answering questions. I was curious if anyone here has tried including 1-2 words of content next to their structural low res, and how that's gone for them?

0

Hey ya'll I would love to form a study group of about 3-4 people to review LR. I have been PTing in the high 160s to low 170s for a while now, but I really struggled with PT 85 LR and one of the LR sections on the August test. I generally get about -3/-4 on a LR section. I do not want to burn more PTs as of now so I would love a study group to review older exams and walk through our individual approach. Let me know if interested!

0

Hello. I wanted to see if there were people who set aside a few months of their life to fully dedicate weeks just for this test. I graduated from college 2 months ago and have been studying for this test full-time and wanted to know if there were others doing so as well. I believe we could make a Zoom call where we study for 3-7 hours a day and keep each other motivated and prevent burnout.

Let me know if interested!

You're invited to my new group 'LSAT students' on GroupMe. Click here to join: https://groupme.com/join_group/95986662/smNJxNdR

3

I answered C because it summarized the argument but I forgot that the question was just looking for the main conclusion/main point (not the whole premise attached). Therefore, A just summarizes/paraphrases the conclusion which is that not all uses of language are metaphorical (because some must be literal = Premise). Thus, it should be A because A is only the conclusion.

0

I frankly don't understand why I'm so bad at logic games. If I were no worse at logic games than I am at reading comprehension and the short answer section, I think I would regularly score in the high 160s/low 170s. I've practiced logic games a fair amount, and I think I've done a fair amount of the 7Sage curriculum on logic games. But I often get in the -8 to -13 range. Do I just need to start the 7Sage curriculum on logic games over again? (This is what I'm probably going to do.) I feel like it's totally feasible for me to regularly get -5 or better on logic games, but that's very much not where I am at present. Any thoughts? (I realize this question has probably been asked countless times, so feel free to point me to an existing answer to this type of question.) Thanks!

0

Confirm action

Are you sure?