I am really struggling to see how answer choice E resolves the paradox best and not D -- E seems to be irrelevant and D does a good job of explaining the different reactions of voters.>
All posts
New post226 posts in the last 30 days
Is it just me that thinks Logic Reasoning is too long on here? To those who took the LSAT, did you skip through logic reasoning or some of it? I have been in it and still have not started Logic Games, should I wait until I finish logic reasoning first or instantly start going to logic game? (I am taking the October LSAT). Please comment!!
Hey 7Sagers!
Aastha here from the 7Sage LSAT Podcast! Something I’ve always loved about being part of 7Sage is how active y’all are on the forums to help each other out. Because of this, we wanted to bring the 7Sage community onto one of our upcoming episodes.
We’re looking to compile the best advice you received when studying for the LSAT. If you have advice you’d like to share, please email Podcast@7Sage.com! Don’t worry about the format, voice memo or text is fine. Thanks so much for helping out your fellow studiers, we’re looking forward to seeing your submissions!
Hey, sorry if this has been posted before but I couldn’t find a thread on it. While filling out one of my LOR’s I noticed it asked me for recommenders title. I was using my boss ive had for 4ish years. I had two questions. Should I use my boss as a recommendation, and his title is Store Manager, it’s not very prestigious should I add his title or leave it blank? thank you in advance
Does anyone know how long it takes to get accommodations approved?
👥 Study Group Name: LSAT Study Group Gangnam Weekend
🔢 I'm currently scoring: 165-170
📆 My planned test date: N/A
📈 To study, I have been: [finishing the CC, taking a PT twice a week, drilling, etc]: I am going through PT1-30 now.
🔑 My goals for this group are: [to hold each other accountable, to hear other perspectives, etc] We can discuss.
🔍 We'll focus on: [Reading Comprehension, Logic Games, Logical Reasoning, etc]. We will do all sections.
📚 When we'll meet and what we'll do: I can only do weekend. We can talk further.
✅ How to join: Send me a DM or comment below please.
Hi is there a way to link my lawhub tests to 7sage? I took one on LawHub assuming that the scores/answers connected to the 7sage platform but don't see it. Is this an option?
Hii I was hoping someone could help me out. I have been trying to log into Lawhub for weeks now and I am unable to. Every time I go into it, it just keeps reloading. I have tried on Chrome, Safari, Firefox, clearing my cache, clearing my history, allowing cookies, allowing block ups, trying to install on my laptop and nothing is working for me. I was wondering if anyone has had this issue? and if so, how did you resolve it?
Thanks!! :)
Anyone interested in a study group for the jan or feb 2024 lsat test?
I want to start with Q27 first. I have read the reasoning behind why (D) is incorrect, and somehow agree, but I absolutely dont see why (E) is correct.
The author doesn't state history is impaired by universal patterns, atleast nowhere where he doesnt use the word "Perhaps".
Here are the following places where he atleast mentions his views against univervsal patterns in the last paragraph.
"But perhaps this discomfort is no bad thing...relinquish the vain hope for inevitability and hence restore us to the contemplation of historical contingency...all of which can serve as stimuli to serious thought.
"Perhaps what is needed is a historical perspective...the particular and unrepeatable details of historical events."
The only phrase that i can find that sort of supports (E) is that the author uses "vain hope", but the following part of the sentence doesn't talk about unversal patterns at all...
Can someone please enlighten me about which part of the passage allows us to assume (E)? Or does "Perhaps" indicate a sense of strong agreement instead of being aware of a possibility?
For Q22, I chose (C), and I later understood that the first part of the sentence "Though seductive in their logic and coherence" makes it incorrect. However, doesnt (E) also rely on the word "perhaps" to indicate a sense of strong agreement?
Thankyou so much who anyone that can help. This is really confusing
Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q#(P#) - [brief description of stimulus]" Also best to post one question per discussion at a time!
Admin note: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-82-section-3-passage-4-passage/
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-82-section-3-passage-4-questions/
PrepTest B - Section 1 - Question 11
We do not hold someone who has a heart attack while driving MR for the damage cause is the C and the claim that the choice of a diet can affect whether or not one has a heart attack it is used to support the C of the argument. The Correct AC is E
Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question."
PrepTest A - Section 4 - Question 09
The argument starts after the words "in fact." The first clause is the conclusion, second clause is the premise, and the final clause is the subsidiary conclusion. CA Choice is C
Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question."
🔢 I'm currently scoring: High 150s low 160s
📆 My planned test date: Unplanned, hoping to study until I feel ready. Aiming for spring of 2024
📈 To study, I have been: I've finished the CC and have been drilling and PTing, hoping to improve my studying with group members
🔑 My goals for this group are: To hold each other accountable and to take opportunities learning and teaching one another
🔍 We'll focus on: All sections, heavier emphasis on LR and RC
📚 When we'll meet and what we'll do: Hoping to determine the best times once I get a group together. I work a 9-5 and am hoping to be able to accommodate a study schedule off of that.
✅ How to join: Message me through here!
👥 Study Group Name: LSAT Study South Korea
🔢 I'm currently scoring: 165-170
📆 My planned test date: N/A
📈 To study, I have been: [finishing the CC, taking a PT twice a week, drilling, etc]: I am going through PT1-30 now.
🔑 My goals for this group are: [to hold each other accountable, to hear other perspectives, etc] We can discuss.
🔍 We'll focus on: [Reading Comprehension, Logic Games, Logical Reasoning, etc]. We will do all sections.
📚 When we'll meet and what we'll do: I can only do weekend. We can talk further.
✅ How to join: Send me a DM or comment below please.
I am taking the LSAT this October. I had a diagnostic of 147, and have been seriously studying since July 2023. My highest score so far is a 159, but my two most recent tests have both been 157s and I haven't seen a score jump in weeks. I am just discouraged, because I want to get a 165+, but it seems my studying has hit a rut, at least when looking at my scores...
Hey 7Sagers,
Here's the official August 2023 LSAT Discussion Thread.
REMINDER: Under your Candidate Agreement, you may not discuss the details of any specific LSAT questions at any time. For the August 2023 LSAT, general discussion of what sections you had, or how difficult you found a given section, or speculation about which sections were scored or unscored, is prohibited until after 9pm ET, Tuesday, August 15th.
Posts that violate these rules will be taken down and may result in disciplinary action from LSAC. Let’s work together to ensure the test is fair to everyone, and not share information before everyone has taken the test.
Some examples of typical comments:
✅ The following comments are okay 🙆♀️
❌ The following comments are over the line 🙅♂️
Good luck to everyone taking the August 2023!
**Please keep all discussions of the August 2023 LSAT here!**(/red)
I frankly don't understand why I'm so bad at logic games. If I were no worse at logic games than I am at reading comprehension and the short answer section, I think I would regularly score in the high 160s/low 170s. I've practiced logic games a fair amount, and I think I've done a fair amount of the 7Sage curriculum on logic games. But I often get in the -8 to -13 range. Do I just need to start the 7Sage curriculum on logic games over again? (This is what I'm probably going to do.) I feel like it's totally feasible for me to regularly get -5 or better on logic games, but that's very much not where I am at present. Any thoughts? (I realize this question has probably been asked countless times, so feel free to point me to an existing answer to this type of question.) Thanks!
Hi everyone! I've been watching some RC live classes and in them JY makes two columns (structural and content) for low res summaries. When I've been doing tests, I've only been making one column which contains structural low res, although I find I never really look at it while answering questions. I was curious if anyone here has tried including 1-2 words of content next to their structural low res, and how that's gone for them?
Because of all of the problems with the remote August LSAT, should I consider switching to in-person for the September exam? Has LSAC committed to solving the issues that came up? I would just switch to in-person, but I'm worried a change in setting will have a significant impact on my score. I've been taking my practice exams in relatively the exact setting I will take my real exam in, and I was really counting on that helping out with my "test day penalty". What is everyone else doing?
Can someone help with analyzing the stimulus?
I am having difficult time identifying the conclusion.
Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of question”
Hey ya'll I would love to form a study group of about 3-4 people to review LR. I have been PTing in the high 160s to low 170s for a while now, but I really struggled with PT 85 LR and one of the LR sections on the August test. I generally get about -3/-4 on a LR section. I do not want to burn more PTs as of now so I would love a study group to review older exams and walk through our individual approach. Let me know if interested!
Hi everyone! I upgraded my account (279/month) to include the two tutoring sessions. How do I go about booking these???
Wanted to see if anyone could share their thoughts / been in a similar position! I'm retaking the LSAT soon and wondering if I should also retake the writing portion. My first writing wasn't bad in terms of structure and argument but it ended abruptly because I ran out of time (was missing two words off the last sentence), and I was wondering if it would be worth it to redo the writing because of it in case it affects admissions.
I am currently studying with an intention of applying for entry in Fall 2025 as I work full time. Would it make sense to purchase CAS now for rec letter purposes from professors at my university. I recently graduated, but am nervous the more I wait, there is a chance they could forget who I was or not remember my contributions in classes.