- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
It is saying that the pesticide and glucose are mixed together, though.
This was my interpretation of it as well.
I guessed and got it right. I'm still not understanding even after the video explanation.
I was thinking the same thing. I don't know how/where the information in the passage would've been beneficial to answering the question stem.
You beat me to this comment verbatim
I'm the exact same way. Most of the time, watching the video explanation makes sense, but then I don't know why I overlooked it the first time.
That's a good question, I was wondering the same thing.
I sounds like it means a positive effect
I agree, even after the explanation, I'm still confused.
Don't know what accede means SIGH
I had the exact same thought process. I initially wanted to choose D, but then I googled the definition of "emergence" and chose a different answer because I thought it was implying a new idea too.
I feel this too. I need to LOCK IN
I'm the exact same way. I'll read the passage, and halfway through, I start to think about everything else BUT the passage. It's hard for me to stay focused and engaged in long, boring texts. SIGH
My mind wandered elsewhere halfway into reading the passage lol
When doing the PrepTests, I did the worst on RC. I hope to improve by the end of this!
4/5 on medium difficulty, I'm not mad about it. Since these types of questions only come up once every LSAT exam, I'm going to just hope for the best!
me too... only the first lesson and I want to quit
I anticipated an answer like E - that the representatives were not being truthful about whether the names on the list were actually in the trade group or not
this has been me all summer HAHA
I really don't understand what the economist's argument is, what they are saying after the "But..." #help
5/5 but on EASY mode :O a win is a win I guess
This helped me understand the stimulus! I thought the stimulus was also saying that wheat required excessive irrigation too.. SIGH