Hi, looking for an in-person study group of 2-3 others to meet up with once a week (every 2?) depending on availability. I am taking the June LSAT and learn best when I have someone to bounce ideas and questions off of. I am not totally new to the LSAT but I am not advanced by any means ( currently in the 150s range rn). Ideally, we'd meet at a coffee shop or park (near WIFI ofc) to either do sections or drills together. I'd also love to do a time PT together once or twice before June!
All posts
New post554 posts in the last 30 days
How does this work?
Hello! I have currently been studying for the LSAT since mid January 2026 and plan on taking it in June and likely August. However, around the beginning of February, I fell a bit behind on the core curriculum and I've been playing catch up. For context, I'm a second semester junior in college, I've found that I have a lot of time during my breaks, but obviously not as much time when I am at school. My main concern is that I feel like I won't be ready to take the exam in June. I start the practice test period this Monday (3/9) so hopefully I start to feel more confident, but right now I am at a standstill. Does anyone have any advice? Would it be optimal to postpone my exam till August, or take one in June and then August?
Hi, I'm Theo. I scored a 176 on the official LSAT, and my highest practice test score was a 180. I've reviewed thousands of LSAT problems and would be happy to share my expertise with future test-takers. Sort the comments on this post by 'most votes' to see student reviews. I can also do in-person tutoring if you live in New York City.
Here are my tips for improving on the LSAT:
Configure your 7Sage preferences so that on blind review, it only recommends the questions you got wrong, skipped, or guessed on.
Do the blind review after each drill, section, and practice test. It doesn't have to be immediately after, but I do not recommend skipping past it.
If you’re not sure how to approach a Logical Reasoning question and there are premises and a conclusion in the stimulus, try highlighting them using the highlighter tools. Use one color for the conclusion, and the same second color for all of the premises. When you review the questions after you’ve submitted them, you can click ‘Show Analysis’ to compare your highlights to what the 7Sage tutors think the premises and conclusion are. Ideally, your highlights should match theirs exactly. If there are words or phrases that they have left out of their highlights, you should have left them out too.
If a sentence within the stimulus contains the word “should” or a synonym of it, that sentence is very often the conclusion.
If a sentence within the stimulus states that a group of people are all incorrect about something, that sentence is very often the conclusion.
For Weaken questions, try negating the stimulus's conclusion, then make up an additional fact that would make the resulting negation true. This fact will often be the correct answer choice for the question.
For the Identify the Conclusion questions, if the stimulus contains a phrase along the lines of “Some people believe dragons are real. However, these people are incorrect”, the correct answer choice will be something like “Dragons are not real”.
For many Most Strongly Supported questions, sometimes you can predict the right answer choice by asking yourself the following: “If the stimulus were a story, what would the moral be?”
For Sufficient Assumption questions in which there is only one premise and one conclusion, you can predict the correct answer by saying: “If [insert the premise here], then [insert the conclusion here]”. The resulting sentence will often bear some resemblance to the correct answer choice.
Please reach out if you need help! DM me or leave a comment, and I'll respond very soon. You can also email me at theodorestrongin@gmail.com
I look forward to meeting with you!
Rate: $100/hr
A screenshot of my official score report is attached below:
Hi my name is allyson and I am currently looking for study buddy's to study in person or online !!!
Hello! Since it’s obviously impossible to attend every live class from every tutor, how do you usually choose which classes to attend when planning your schedule? Also, do you have a favorite tutor you like and why, because I found them all are very good, just can't attend all classes
Seems kind of predatory!
Ability to full screen someones stream
A little chat feature
Listen and subscribe:
A student asks why their LSAT practice test scores are dropping the more they study. @AlexJacobs and @BaileyLuber break down why this happens to many LSAT students, how burnout and inefficient study can stall progress, and what to do if your studying starts working against you.
Score just going back and forth from 163-165. Chat am I cooked?
Looking for a group to occasionally meet up, study together, and support each other through this time!!
Is there a calendar link that I can put directly into my Google Calendar to save all upcoming Live Classes instead of having to add them manually one by one? I had it on my calendar from the previous website but it stopped updated this month. If anyone has any info please let me know, thanks so much!
Hi everyone, looking for study buddies near Miami/Miramar FL areas! Plan on taking LSAT in June as well!
Might be a heavy lift, but would appreciate a feature that 1. outlines the type of wrong answer (too strong, too weak, out of scope, etc. etc.) and 2. identifies weaknesses by question type (i.e. tendency to choose answers that are too strong when answering necessary assumption questions)
Does anyone have a comprehensive cheat sheet for conditional reasoning- like everything covered in the lessons?
Chat, hop on Study Room 1 VC
Hi all, we just launched Study Room!
They are voice chat rooms with screenshare, like in Discord so you can drill and study together!
This is in beta. There are bugs so please be patient with us, thank you!
Hi everyone,
Maybe I've missed a discussion somewhere or missed this in the core curriculum, but does anyone have any tips on how to effectively use the search function for RC? I've currently been using it for stated questions, searching keywords, and then reading around there for context.
Is this a good/smart/effective strategy? Or does anyone have any recommendations?
When drilling I have my BR settings set to only show me questions I get incorrect (which I know is not the recommended method of BR but its what I am doing rn) and when I correct my mistakes in BR, if I BR answered correctly by BR score becomes 100% (if I only had to BR 1 problem out of 5 in a drill for example). So my BR percentage would be 100% in the drill section. But in the drill analysis chart, it would show BR 20% or 1/5 correct instead of the 100% (again if I only BRed the single question I got wrong and did not BR the ones I got right in the drill). This is not a big deal but it makes it harder for me to visualize my results in a cohesive manner. Please make it so the data is consistent.
Hello,
Is anyone studying for LSAT and would like to study together? We can do drills together and go over our thought process!
Registered for April LSAT!
JOINED GROUP CHAT AND GIVE YOUR PHOEN NUMBER.
Hi,
I plan to take my third LSAT in June/August and am hoping to find a virtual or in-person study buddy. I have been struggling with the LSAT and I am trying to have a new approach to it. I think an accountability partner will help me improve.
Is there a place on this platform where there are articles or videos specifically about test-taking strategies like whether we should answer all the questions in the order in which they appear, whether we should skip some and leave them for the end, and if so, which ones, and other similar topics?
Is anyone else who is doing the core curriculum drill questions experiencing a glitch with the timing result? The blind review will say that I spent more than twice the target time on a question, but then the results shows me that I spent 0 seconds on it? Is there any way to fix this?
Anyone else finding that lawgic is just adding confusion?
Hey everyone! I've been a longtime discussion board lurker, but this is my first time posting for advice, so here goes...
For context, I started studying about 16 months ago, and I'd say I've done a good job staying consistent throughout that period while also working full-time. My diagnostic was a 158 in Dec 2024, and, since then, I have worked my way up to an average in the 170s using 7Sage.
I took the official test for the first time in October 2024 when I was averaging about 170, but I scored a 165. I retook in November and matched my 170 average. I was pleased with my Nov score and the hard work that went into it, but I ultimately kept studying for February.
I felt like I was making a lot of progress and seeing consistency in the weeks leading up to the exam: my PTs directly before were 170, 175, 177, 179 (the ones before that were retakes so I don't count those as reflective for score diagnostic purposes).
I felt confident going into test day, but I ultimately ended up with a 171. I am glad I improved, and I know this is a great score, but I can't help but feel disappointed, as I feel like my PTs leading up to test day indicate that I am capable of more.
To note, I was careful to take these PTs in accordance with true timing/break requirements, and I tried to make my physical PT environment/routine as close as possible to test day. I also very much tried to prioritize wellness in the month leading up to the test (sleep/food/cutting drinking etc). There is nothing I can put my finger on externally that I think would've been a huge game changer in that respect. I also BR/WAJ in depth after drills and PTs.
So, that brings me to my ultimate question: should I retake for a fourth time?
My ultimate goal has always been somewhere in the 173-175 range (dreaming big for T-14), and I want to get there, but I am worried because I have heard that after 3 LSAT attempts law schools might begin to be critical of additional takes. Does the risk outweigh the reward?
Grateful for any advice from fellow studiers and LSAT legends alike (summoning the greats @J.Y.Ping & @Kevin_Lin with a ouija logic game board lol).




