All posts
New post626 posts in the last 30 days
Hello! I am potentially going to postpone the exam, and I have already done so before. I am not scoring exactly where I want to be yet. Is it bad to postpone the exam or should I just go ahead and take it?
Thank you!
Marisa Myers
What’s up, my 7Sagers!
The Mile High Group 🏔- a Colorado LSAT study group for anyone taking the LSAT in August, September, October, or November 2026.
All people are welcome here, whether you’re just starting your LSAT journey or already deep in practice tests and conditional logic nightmares. This group is focused on helping each other grow, improve, and push toward 160–180 scores together.
We’re here to break bad habits, build real confidence, strengthen understanding, and create a space where people can ask questions without feeling intimidated. It’s about getting better every week. We’ll review strategies, talk through difficult questions, share resources, keep each other accountable, and celebrate progress together. Just people trying to climb higher together. Bring your ambition. Bring your questions. And let’s get to work.
(Discord and Zoom coming soon)
Hello,
I’ve taken 3 PTs in the last 3 weeks in preparation for the June test, and I have got a 158 each time. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t mind this score. I think it’s ok and it’s absolutely better than previous scores I’ve got (including my 156 for the April test), but I am trying to figure out how to improve on it before next weekend. I know that’s not much time but I ran into timing issues with the last PT and just felt so fatigued that I knew I didn’t do well on the rest. I truly think I can get my score up to a 165, but what I’m wondering is if there are any tips or tricks out there that people have to suggest either preparation wise or test taking wise. I can put the time in, I’ve taken multiple PTs, I’ve done the core curriculum (or most of it), I just want to know what else I can do to push past the high 150s. I might retake in August but if I can do well enough this weekend to avoid that, that would be ideal. Thanks!
I'm almost 3 months into my studies and my best PT is 159 untimed. Any tips on improving LR stamina and speed? I start disassociating after the first section and my focus just plummets. I can't even attempt timed PTs yet; I have never finished a section and attempted all questions. Any study tips or ways to improve focus and not experience cognitive overload? I'm trying to slowly build it up and focusing on fundamentals but wondering if there's ways to speed up the process.
For context, my diagnostic was 139 so I know I'm improving. My biggest issue isn't understanding every question but maintaining focus and processing information efficiently for multiple sections. Did anyone else struggle with this? What can help build endurance and transition from untimed accuracy to timed performance?
Hello,
I am a 34 year old mom in San Jose, California looking to meeting and study with other people who are in the same area of life as me. I am studying in between work hours and when the kids go to sleep. If any of this resonates, lets study together!
I have a timing accommodation, and it would be really helpful if the Timing column after a drill or section could be adjusted to reflect timing accommodated testing conditions.
Right now, the target times are based only on standard timing. That means I have to manually calculate what the target time would be under my accommodation in order to gauge whether my pacing was actually on track.
A simple solution could be a dropdown within the Timing section that allows users to select their timing conditions. The default could remain standard time, but users could also choose common accommodation settings like 1.5x or 2.0x time.
The selected setting would then automatically adjust the target time, timing feedback, and over/under calculations for the respective activity.
For students testing with timing accommodations, this would make the timing data much more useful and provide a more accurate picture of pacing without requiring our additional calculations.
When I am doing drills and I get my results from the drill, I am noticing that I got some of the questions right the first time even though the question is circled in pink during the Blind Review portion of the drill. Is this so they try to trick you into changing your answer? This whole time I thought any questions that are circled for the Blind Review portion needed to be changed because they are wrong.
Can someone confirm please? Thank you!
Will the updated Interface have a highlight of where to look for a specific phrase from the question stem?
I’m an internationally educated applicant applying to JD program (not an LLM because I also earned a bachelor’s degree in the United States).
LSAC is requiring me to submit my foreign university transcripts for evaluation through its own international credential process.
My situation is that I already had my foreign credentials evaluated by WES several years ago when I was applying to a U.S. university.
However, LSAC now does not accept WES evaluations and requires original transcripts sent according to its own procedures.
The problem is that my former medical university in Georgia (the country) will issue official transcripts and supporting documents, but they do not mail documents directly to third parties.
LSAC, on the other hand, appears to require the institution itself to send the documents in a sealed envelope.
Has anyone dealt with a similar situation involving a university in Eastern Europe or another country where schools do not directly mail records?
Would LSAC accept documents if the university prepared and sealed them, and I arranged courier pickup from the university? Alternatively, are there any other options when the institution will issue the documents but will not handle the mailing process itself?
Any advice or experiences would be greatly appreciated.
I've been at this horrible test for over 2 years now, and can barely crack the 150s. I've used every major platform, courses, private tutoring, and nothing moves the needle. I have a 3.1 lsac GPA so to even be considered anywhere decent is near impossible. I'm just so tired and disappointed. It feels like I'm trying to revive a dead horse with holding out hope that the 160s is possible. It just isn't at this point and I should really just pack it up, but my pride and embarrassment are in the way. The more I subject myself to this the worse I feel. I just wanted to vent here because it seems like everyone is so supportive. Is anyone else in a similar boat?
Hi everyone,
I’m looking for some advice on next steps. I applied this cycle and was not accepted to the schools I was hoping for, including Barry Law and Stetson. I’m disappointed, but I don’t want to stay stuck in that feeling. I still want to go to law school, and I’m willing to study again and reapply stronger.
For context, I’m currently active duty military and planning to use the time I have left in service to improve my application, especially my LSAT. I’m trying to figure out the smartest way to approach a retake and future applications.
For anyone who reapplied after being denied, what helped you the most? Was it mainly improving your LSAT, rewriting your personal statement, applying earlier, adding more schools, or something else? Also, how would you recommend structuring LSAT study while working full-time?
Any honest advice is appreciated. I’m disappointed, but I’m not ready to give up.
Hello! My name is Jaida, and I am planning to take my LSAT this August. I live in a pretty small town and would love to form an online "study group". I want this group to encompass struggles, accomplishments, complaints, and community, as I do not currently have that based on where I live. I'd love to transition it over to social media and really expand from just a study group to an LSAT community, after all, we will all be peers in the legal field at some point! Feel free to join here or add me on Instagram and send me a message. @jaidaandersonnn
So for the CAS GPA calculator I'm suppose to put how many units I have for a certain grade type right? But there is a limit to 100 unit per letter grade...?? Which is a problem for me bc my special snowflake school (UCLA) used a quarter system. Yes I can convert, but I can easily end up with fractions once I do. And I just don't understand why there is a cap at 100 units when there are people who got straights A's in undergrad? Or those who double majored?
This is my breakdown:
A+ = 50.5 quarter units
A = 109.5 quarter units
A- = 15.0 quarter units
So luckily only the A+ doesn't divide cleanly for me, but I still think that it's weird to have a 100 unit cap on the calculator. Like, what if all the A+ I got were A's??? Then I'd have no way to use the calculator. But then again I suck at tech so plz lemme know if I used the tool wrong.
Also: Being able to input units ending in .5 fractions would be helpful.
I'm registered for the June 2026 LSAT (June 5th), which means that the Argumentative Writing should be available to complete by now. I managed to login to ProctorU, download the browser and all that, successfully. The only problem is that the website won't let me register for a new exam to be able to actually complete the Argumentative Writing. Did anyone else have this problem, and if so, how did you figure it out?
I am so bad at these. I am good at LR except for flaw and one other question type. I just can't figure it out. Sometimes I'll find a gap but it isn't the right one. Other times the answer choices are too subtle or I find multiple ones correct. Sometimes I don't see how the answer is really a flaw. I need a way to reframe these/think about them correctly.
Hi guys! I'm taking the June LSAT at the end of this week. I'm just posting to ask if anybody has any burnout-related info or advice.
For some context, I've been studying consistently for about two months now. I haven't really found myself struggling prior to this week. During the second week of May, I took two practice exams and scored a 161 and 162. During the third week of May, I took one practice exam with double time to focus on accuracy and scored a 166, which is my best so far.
Last week, I started working a full-time internship (five days a week, 9am-5pm, plus three hours of commuting because of traffic🥲). My score immediately decreased and I got two 156s. I've had a really hard time focusing on studying each night and I've been feeling somewhat more rushed with the time constraints than normal. I also have ADHD and testing anxiety so thats probably not helping this situation lol. Could this sudden score decrease be from work-related burnout, and has anybody else experienced anything similar? I was planning to take off work the day before my exam to recharge, but now I'm worried that won't be enough to reset my brain. I'm just not totally sure what to do here. Thank you and good luck to everyone testing this week!!
Dear everyone,
Just a quick question. If we have a A correlates with B and then a A causes B type of argument as a weakening stimulus, can we weaken the argument by showing that a new factor C causes B? or does the AC HAVE to touch on both A and B? I am getting super confused with this concept all of a sudden so any kind of help would be greatly greatly appreciated. Thank you.
This has been happening for a while now, which makes writing long and comprehensive comments a bit discouraging. I know I can write them in a notepad and paste them into the comments section, but it would be nice to be able to directly write in the comments.
By the way, I would suggest adding a "Bug" topic so that staff can easily go through all the posts bringing up bugs, which should have more priority over feature requests.
I haven't taken any of the PrepTests available on 7Sage yet. Yet, I only have 14 100% fresh ptests left. The rest are all 98% fresh or less. I understand 7Sage uses a bunch of tests for drills and sections, but the algorithm has been giving me questions even out of PrepTests that are explicitly listed as available to take as tests on 7Sage. I've only been using this site for under a month and again, have taken zero of the PrepTests available on 7sage. I'm honestly pretty upset that my preptest bank has been depleted to this level already. How can I preserve the only 14 fresh tests I still have?
Suggestion for Live Class Question Pool Enhancement
I have noticed that in the live classes, we don't really solve questions from the newer PTs which are more representative of the current test. I think it would be an excellent idea to have live classes where the teachers go over the newer questions as well because I feel like there's a difference between questions from PT150+ vs PTs from like the 100-140 range. The older questions are more cookie cutter, less tricky, and have more obvious patterns whereas the questions from the newest PTs are more convoluted and harder to comprehend so I would love to see live classes where the teachers break down those questions for us as well.
Feel free to let me know if I'm missing something. Out of the many live classes I attended, I don't think I have ever seen the teachers give us a question from PT 150+ which is why I wanted to propose this idea. If the reason for not including those is because y'all don't want people who still haven't solved those PTs to be exposed to them via live classes, I get it. Maybe the class labels can say something like "Disclaimer: this class will contain questions from the newest PTs (150+)." I hope this makes sense!
According to the AI Coach’s analysis of my most recent PrepTests, there is no longer a specific question type pattern that can be found across my wrong answers — for the most part (and with the exception of an unusually bad test I took while distracted and sick), the questions I am getting wrong are the three to four level 4-5 questions on each test.
When I review those questions, I am generally able to understand both where I reasoned incorrectly and why the correct answer is correct, so I am not incapable of understanding them; however, I often make small mistakes parsing these questions and the possible answers when under time pressure. I think I could benefit from specifically drilling these harder questions to build both accuracy and speed in interpreting them.
Is there a way to drill by difficulty and not by question type?
Hi guys, I was thinking of taking the August LSAT and have been studying and got the content covered, was wondering if anyone would be intrested in being in a gc so that we could do practice tests once a week together? and hold each other accountable - I wasn't sure if there was a groupchat already made.. :)
Hi 7Sage community! I had a quick question about the new LSAT interface that has now been confirmed for adoption starting in August. I realized while practicing with the new interface on 7Sage that in RC, the new interface no longer highlights the portion of the text that the question stem refers to. This is especially confusing and time-consuming when questions ask us to identify multiple sentences (e.g., how does the second sentence of the first paragraph relate to the third and fourth sentences of the third paragraph?). Does anyone know whether the highlight feature will disappear on the official test as well? :/
Does anyone have an efficient way of studying the Logical Reasoning question stem? I was thinking of making flash cards but I am open to any other ideas. Thank you!




