Question on using LR Drill package for fool proof.

Artorius

Hi everyone,

I just printed the PT 1-35 LG Drill package and would like to use it for the fool proof. I have the following concerns:

1) Is there any practice test(s) that is too old which we should avoid working on?

2) Is there any LG question type(s) which no longer appears on recent LSAT which we should avoid as well?

Thank you.

Sami

@"Arthur K." said:
Hi everyone,

I just printed the PT 1-35 LG Drill package and would like to use it for the fool proof. I have the following concerns:

1) Is there any practice test(s) that is too old which we should avoid working on?

No. All Logic games from previous tests are great to practice for the upcoming LSAT. Most of them are the bread and butter from which other games on newer tests are derived.

2) Is there any LG question type(s) which no longer appears on recent LSAT which we should avoid as well?

It's actually the opposite. A lot of the weird games that had only appeared once or twice are making a come back now. They are especially great for you to practice thinking on your feet as some of the newer games require you to think in this way.

I hope this helped. Good luck studying : )

Artorius

Hi Sami,

Thanks for the clarification.

In this way I have no worry starting from PT 1 Game 1.

Sami

@"Arthur K." said:
Hi Sami,

Thanks for the clarification.

In this way I have no worry starting from PT 1 Game 1.

None at all

Sami

P.S. I think the title was meant to say "question on LG drill".

akistotle

@Sami said:

It's actually the opposite. A lot of the weird games that had only appeared once or twice are making a come back now. They are especially great for you to practice thinking on your feet as some of the newer games require you to think in this way.

That's what I heard! (I haven't done recent PTs yet.) I should drill weird games more