@"Paul Pederson" said:
Im working my way through PTing the 60s. My question is whether or not the 70s LR is much different from the 60s LR? Just curious.
Haha. I was about to answer that question then I saw my old post was tagged.
I definitely think the LSAT writers are evolving and there are going to be differences but the difference is much less and more gradual than I think what people think they are. PT 70 is a continuation of PT69 and 71 of 70 and so on. Changes happen but its gradual. I still score the around the same average in blind tests. lol
@"Paul Pederson" said:
Im working my way through PTing the 60s. My question is whether or not the 70s LR is much different from the 60s LR? Just curious.
Haha. I was about to answer that question then I saw my old post was tagged.
Hehe. I thought about mentioning your name (@Sami) but instead I posted the link. lol
@"Paul Pederson" said:
Im working my way through PTing the 60s. My question is whether or not the 70s LR is much different from the 60s LR? Just curious.
Haha. I was about to answer that question then I saw my old post was tagged.
Hehe. I thought about mentioning your name (@Sami) but instead I posted the link. lol
Comments
It is somewhat different but not vastly different.
Sami had a thread about how 70s are not that different:
https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/12748/70-series-and-newer-tests-not-more-difficult
Thanks!
Haha. I was about to answer that question then I saw my old post was tagged.
I definitely think the LSAT writers are evolving and there are going to be differences but the difference is much less and more gradual than I think what people think they are. PT 70 is a continuation of PT69 and 71 of 70 and so on. Changes happen but its gradual. I still score the around the same average in blind tests. lol
Hehe. I thought about mentioning your name (@Sami) but instead I posted the link. lol
Less work for me . hehe