Only need major help in one section - how to approach with 7sage?

sltesssltess Member
edited February 2018 in General 6 karma

Has anyone gone through the coursework who only needed help with one section? My LG is very weak but my LR and RC are already where I need them to be for test day. Has anyone been in this situation starting off with 7sage? Did you find going through the entire course worth the time, or have another approach to using the 7sage resources?

Comments

  • AlexAlex Alum Member ⭐
    edited February 2018 23929 karma

    I originally signed up just for logic games lessons. I ended up using the entire course and I don't regret it. I think one of the most limiting factors to scoring well on LR/RC is simply people's ability to read complex sentences and distill them into simple to understand thoughts, while accurately preserving their nuance. JY's lessons do a great job at teaching you how to do both of these things through easy to understand lessons on parsing complex grammar and the best lessons on conditional "lawgic" ever created.

    Actually, before I signed up for the course, I was happy with my LR/RC too. I was only aiming for a 160 to go to my alma mater's law school. Once I signed up with 7Sage and saw how much potential there was for improvement in my LR/RC, my goals completely changed as well.

  • Seeking PerfectionSeeking Perfection Alum Member
    4423 karma

    This was exactly where I was last February. I had managed a 172 despite not finishing the logic games section and knew I could do better if I could improve on games.

    I bought the starter course because I wanted to support 7sage and figured it couldn't hurt. I think you have enough time to go through the core curriculum like I did. However, the bulk of my prep was foolproofing logic games and that is what I would recommend for you. You do that foolproofing process at least with the first 35 tests worth of games and you are almost guaranteed to improve. For me, that improvement along with a bunch of the newer PTs with blind review took me all the way to a 180 on the September test.

    https://7sage.com/logic-game-explanations/

    https://7sage.com/how-to-get-a-perfect-score-on-the-logic-games/

  • LCMama2017LCMama2017 Alum Member
    2134 karma

    @"Seeking Perfection" said:
    This was exactly where I was last February. I had managed a 172 despite not finishing the logic games section and knew I could do better if I could improve on games.

    I bought the starter course because I wanted to support 7sage and figured it couldn't hurt. I think you have enough time to go through the core curriculum like I did. However, the bulk of my prep was foolproofing logic games and that is what I would recommend for you. You do that foolproofing process at least with the first 35 tests worth of games and you are almost guaranteed to improve. For me, that improvement along with a bunch of the newer PTs with blind review took me all the way to a 180 on the September test.

    https://7sage.com/logic-game-explanations/

    https://7sage.com/how-to-get-a-perfect-score-on-the-logic-games/

    Wow - thx for sharing.

  • sltesssltess Member
    6 karma

    Thanks for the thoughts! Looking closer at the full syllabus (showing hidden lessons) has made things a lot clearer for me as well, as far as what's available for digging deep into the LG. Now it's just a matter of deciding whether getting the extra problem sets & tests here vs elsewhere is worth the extra $$$.

  • westcoastbestcoastwestcoastbestcoast Alum Member
    3788 karma

    Yes dig deep on the logic games section of the curriculum. Once you get a grasp of the fundamentals, its all about drilling and practice at that point. You are in an envious position because logic games is the most amenable to improvement.

Sign In or Register to comment.