I've taken all of the PTs 60 onwards in full. Does it make sense to redo the more recent ones (78-84) as I get closer to the November test date, or should I take the earlier PTs that I haven't taken before? Thanks so much!
Did you thoroughly review the PTs from that set? By thoroughly review I mean are you able to explain the underlying logic behind any question on that set? If you haven’t, I would redo the exams you had the most trouble with+ thorough review.
If you have, then I would suggest doing exams from the 50s set strictly timed and reviewed as well as re-reviewing some material from the new exams to stay fresh.
I would do a mixture of both. I think that older PTs (especially 40-60) are close enough to current ones to be worth studying and taking. You could also break up the ones you've already done and drill them/foolproof the games/using them as fake experimental sections for your full timed PTs. If you do decide to redo PTs, you should know that your scores will probably be a little bit artificially inflated.
Comments
I have the same question, looking forward to any suggestions as well.
Did you thoroughly review the PTs from that set? By thoroughly review I mean are you able to explain the underlying logic behind any question on that set? If you haven’t, I would redo the exams you had the most trouble with+ thorough review.
If you have, then I would suggest doing exams from the 50s set strictly timed and reviewed as well as re-reviewing some material from the new exams to stay fresh.
I hope this helps
David
Edit: spelling
I would do a mixture of both. I think that older PTs (especially 40-60) are close enough to current ones to be worth studying and taking. You could also break up the ones you've already done and drill them/foolproof the games/using them as fake experimental sections for your full timed PTs. If you do decide to redo PTs, you should know that your scores will probably be a little bit artificially inflated.