Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- 33.3K All Categories
- 28K LSAT
- 17K General
- 5.2K Logical Reasoning
- 1.4K Reading Comprehension
- 1.7K Logic Games
- 70 Podcasts
- 193 Webinars
- 12 Scholarships
- 194 Test Center Reviews
- 2.1K Study Groups
- 112 Study Guides/Cheat Sheets
- 2.5K Specific LSAT Dates
- 16 November 2024 LSAT
- 13 October 2024 LSAT
- 9 September 2024 LSAT
- 38 August 2024 LSAT
- 28 June 2024 LSAT
- 4 April 2024 LSAT
- 11 February 2024 LSAT
- 23 January 2024 LSAT
- 37 November 2023 LSAT
- 43 October 2023 LSAT
- 14 September 2023 LSAT
- 38 August 2023 LSAT
- 27 June 2023 LSAT
- 30 Sage Advice
- 5K Not LSAT
- 4K Law School Admissions
- 13 Law School Explained
- 10 Forum Rules
- 632 Technical Problems
- 286 Off-topic
PT4.S1.Q10 - Artificial fertilizers
omerico7
Member
Could someone explain this question to me please?
Comments
The argument concludes that the need for artificial fertilizers will be reduced. And why is that? Because these wheat strains will play host to R. bacteria. Now what is the argument assuming? It seems to assume that this R. bacteria will produce fixed nitrogen, which is stated in the first sentence to be essential, or necessary for the wheat to grow. If the R. bacteria fails to produce fixed nitrogen, it is not necessarily true that the need for artificial fertilizers will be reduced.