I have been studying since December and have improved significantly. I completed the 7sage curriculum in a month and a half and have seen a 19 point increase so far. My diagnostic was a 147, second preptest- 155, 3rd- 166, 4th- 165. My goal is to score higher than a 168, but I would really like to score above 170 and attend a T13 school in hopes of securing a NYC Biglaw job. Is it fathomable to jump up to the 170s after having already improved substantially?
I really need to improve on RC (I consistently get around -8)
I bought Cambridge drilling packets, Powerscore Bibles, Powerscore Bible Workbooks, and The LSAT Trainer.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Comments
You will always wish you worked harder and gotten a better score even if you end up with a 175. Sometimes you just have to face the reality that you may not go higher than you wished for in time .
Also, hang in there! I I have so many friends that made 20+ jumps in their LSAT studying and got from the low 150s to mid/high 170s, which is very similar to where you're att. You can do it, just PRACTICE PRACTICE PRACTICE!
After completing the 7sage curriculum, you are ready to tackle practice tests. But the more tests you do, the more you will be internalizing the methods you learned. At times you will need to refer back to the lessons, but the practice tests will be the crucial part of reinforcing those methods into your process. So since you have only done 4, I'd predict increases accompanying your future tests.
Good luck!
There is nothing genetic or inherent about this test. I hate when I hear people say that they just "aren't good" at the LSAT, as though some people come out of the womb being able to do RC or LG. Proper LSAT study isn't composed of learning tricks or shortcuts for beating the test, rather, it changes the way you think to make you more logical and less flawed in your thinking. Sometimes it takes a long time to transform your brain, but it's possible (i.e. brain plasticity).
As @blah170blah said, think about RC as one big LR section. LSAC uses many similar tricks on RC answer choices as they do for LR. There is an RC version of MBT questions, as well as RC strengthen and weaken questions. If there is a huge delta between your LR and RC performance, then diagnose why that may be, given that the two sections have a lot in common.
Thanks for the responses. I just have one more question: Should I not take around 8-10 PTs and save them just in case I don't score above 170 and need to retake?
Or should I not BR every PT, so I can take them again at a later date?
http://tinypic.com/r/153bucl/8
If you are doing something this comprehensive, then running out of PTs shouldn't be an issue.
If you still want to consider whether to save PT's, then figure out how well you remember PT material. Some people have extremely good memories, so they can't reuse PT's. In this case, you should save a few. I have a terrible short and long-term memory, so I was able to reuse a lot of PTs after maybe a month of not seeing them.
Keep at it, and don't stop taking PTs. If you need to retake, so be it. I took EVERY PT I had before my first take and did a retake after studying older material I had already seen. I still improved both on my BR and on my actual retake. I wouldn't worry about holding material in reserve once you've finished the course completely and you're into the PT world.
You can do it!!!