Hi Everyone
In the beginning of doing prep test, my highest actual score is 152 with highest blind review score 162 after 7 prep tests. I figured something went wrong and I stopped doing prep-test and focused on drilling cambridge RC, LR section. I just restarted prep test this week. I got 155 in prep test 47 with BR score 167, and I got another 155 with BR score 173 in prep test 64. Does the difference between BR score and actual score signify how much I can improve?
Another thing is when I do LR sections, I always have second thoughts. Something like "oh man, why do I get stuck even before question 10, this should be easy" and I vacillate between 2 or 3 answer choices a lot, which wasted me lots of time. When I BR these questions, I usually found I chose right answer or I got it after several thoughts. It happened to me in the RC as well since I want to get all of questions right in the first passage which is supposed to be easier than other passages. I normally get above 20+ questions right in LG. Did what I said ever occur to you guys? How did you guys overcome this barrier? Thank you so much 7sagers!
Comments
Also, I wouldn't say it's the case anymore that the first passage is always easiest. It may be or may not be. In LR, I do feel that generally the questions at the beginning are still easier relative to the end of the section (with a few more curveballs thrown in lately early on). Maybe instead of thinking it should be easy, you should focus on asking yourself if you have sufficient reason to either eliminate 4 wrong answer choices or 100% confirm the correct one.
*However*, for other types of questions where there are SO many possibilities for the correct answer, having a hard and fast pre-phrase can actually be detrimental and lead you to eliminate answers too hastily. Some examples of these types of questions would be strengthen/weaken, NA (sometimes), etc.
If there are a lot of possibilities for the correct answer and you try to pre-phrase, you're almost closing yourself off to finding the correct one because the chances of finding a match are slim to none.
What I recommend instead is trying to think a *way* in which the argument could be weakened but trying to stay away from specifics which is, by the way, the same thing as identifying assumptions which is pretty much the same thing as understanding the argument to begin with.
Hope that helps.
When you're stuck between two choices, compare each to the stimulus and remind yourself of the question stem. If there are subtle or "small word" differences between AC's (some vs most, modifiers, etc.) where the stimulus either has or lacks those subtleties/small words, well, the one that matches the stimulus will be the right choice (unless it's an except question, of course).
On BR I read the passage again and write down the author's assertions and argument on a separate piece of paper. I always make sure to write down his reaction towards the critics, such as how strongly he/she agrees or disagrees with them (or if he/she is neutral). It's always best to look at the bigger picture in a passage (why is this stated, what purpose does this assertion serve, etc.).