Hi guys,
I've just made a new schedule for myself and I wanted your opinion on it. I've been studying for the LSAT for about a year and have already read the LSAT Trainer once and gone through the 7sage curriculum twice. Currently, I've gone through most PTs in the 30s and 40s. With the remaining time, I was planning on starting on PT 52 and doing two PTs a week, and doing up to three a week in September when I'm on my annual leave from work. This is my third and last attempt at taking the LSAT, so I thought it'd be a good idea to go through all of the remaining PTs and save the most recent for last. As I go along, I was planning on reviewing key issues and doing some drilling, as needed.
Do you guys think this is a good study schedule or do you think it would be more useful of my time to just take one PT a week and start with more recent ones? Thanks for sharing your thoughts/advice
Comments
Hope this helps! Good luck!
Most important - I want to stress quality over quantity. Yes, top scorers often take lots of PTs, but Proper Review is so important. I'd rather a student properly review and get the most out of PTs - even if it means doing less PTs overall.
@"Quick Silver" Yes, I took a couple of the PTs in the 60s about a year ago, pretty early on in my studying.
@c.janson35 I'm leaving about a week and a half at the end to solidify/do basic review. I won't be leaving the last PTs til the *very* end, but I was planning on doing them sometime in early/mid September (rather than now-ish or in August). I was just wondering if anyone had a different approach/a compelling reason to do them earlier than that.
I guess the main takeaway from this is that I should really make sure I do careful review regardless of the number of PTs I end up doing?