Hi guys,
Just wanted to gather some opinions from you all about how you are preparing for the newer logic games. As many have noticed the games have changed after the mid PT 50s to late 50s, and it seems there are more "randomized hybrid" games that now appear on each PT. I had been practicing with the Fool Proof method for all logic games before what I consider to be the modern LSAT (PTs 53+), but I was stumped on the newer logic games when I first encountered them. I suspect the skills I've garnered from the older games should help me in the newer ones, but honestly, at the moment I see the older games as wasted effort if the newer games continue to be so different and continuously changing.
I suspect this is LSAC's response to ever more clever test prep companies and their formulaic strategies. Any thoughts would be appreciated, thanks.
Regards,
Eric
Comments
Any thoughts from the 7Sage team?
Some of the earlier ones are VERY abstract and almost arithmetic. The newer ones conform to such categories as in/out, sequencing, grouping.
I would not say the newer LGs are easy, but certainly it is possible to get 100% of the newer LGs right as they are methodical.
It seems harder to pinpoint the key inferences and neatly split up the boards to cover up all the possibilities.
So yea, I guess we need to train ourselves in brute forcing quickly and accurately.
How is everyone else doing on the newer logic games? Were they similarly okay for you as the older ones? Or did you have to re-drill games again in order to better yourself for the newer ones?