I think my mistake was cramming. I'm not smart enough as many others and cramming made learning LR really hard. I couldn't keep focus and juggling work, LSAT, and family commitments was really tough. If I take it slow, and just focus on improvi…
I'm a little worried.
My format was LR-RC-LR-LG-LR.
The first LR was pretty straight forward. I was able to answer every question within time, and there were a couple of questions I wasn't too sure about. I think I got at most maybe 4 wrong.
Th…
thx avery i will fix my example. i was on my phone wasn't really paying attention to the logic i was just trying to give a general example.
glad u are able to see the difference daniel. GL.
in argument part questions, you are asked to explain the purpose of a part of an argument.
for example:
hot surfaces are red. this surface is hot. thus, this surface is red.
what is the role played by 'this surface is hot'? Well, it is the co…
FIRST OF ALL I APOLOGIZE FOR MAKING A MISTAKE IN THE GAME ABOVE.
FIXED IT.
SORRY FOR MISLEADING ANYONE!!!! REREAD IT!!!
man i suck at teaching other ppl im sorry. shasang i hope i didnt confuse u lol.. if you have a specific example i'll be glad…
as a side note, i would not be too concerened if you aren't 100% through in the percent bar.
it counts the included PT explanations as part of the completeness, and sometimes you don't go through all the questions because its kind of hard to get 10…
for such games, your inference diagram is your best friend.
Here's a very simple example... let's say you have 6 variables: A B C D E F
after going through the givens, you come up with this inference:
/A -> B -> C ->/E
and B -> /F
…
I "retook" PT 66 and did so much better. Yay!
CJ and others, how do you go over LR questions you got wrong? Is there some different strategy you guys use? I can remember the correct answer... but I try to convince myself the other 4 choices are…
Any tips on reviewing PTs I've already done?
I can remember literally every answer when I take a PT and it annoys the crap out of me. I like my memory because it helps me in RC but not when it comes to reviewing old PTs!!!!!!
I read on TLS that it is best to send two. I think it was a harvard law school admissions officer (or the head of harvard law school admissions) who said that.
Did you guys waive your rights to see the LOR?
Hi Steven A (there's two stevens in this lol)
99% of the time, I split the board when there's a given condition along these lines:
(1) A can go either first or last.
(2) A can go second or fourth (there's 5 possibilities).
^ with those, you can …
Lol I took PT 63 yesterday and there was a sequencing game in it.
It is possible to get 100% accuracy in LGs. I got the dino game right, for example, during timed. It took me 12-13 minutes; it was just an in/out grouping game.
The games are …
I think only LR has gotten harder.
If anything, LGs now seem to conform heavily to the rules and tricks we learned in the syllabus. The games are in/out, sequencing, involve grouping, or are just an amalgamation (LSAT vocab word! #dealwithit) of e…
Edit:
nvm I'm taking PT 63 today.
I did well on 62. I got 8 wrong again in LR. Ended up with a good score though... dat curve.
CJ let me know if you want to go over it.