I see there's a long discussion about setting up study groups but I'm afraid I don't think anything has happened. Could we move the ball forward? A bit about me: I'm taking it in Sept 2018, my score is 161, aiming for 170+.
> @LSAT_Wrecker said:
> > @mgzero2 said:
> > Yes, but I don't think in those tests. Think more like 62+ being far harder than anything 1-60.
> >
> > They have shifted from basically wanting simple " ...
Was it after the 5th section or one of the other sections? It's crazy how who you have as a proctor matters so much. I'm sorry but I'm sure it's happened before. Some proctors can really be major ball busters and others are so lackadaisical
I don’t really think stopping cheating/blatant rule violation is “ball busting.” It seems like bamboo is taking the high road and accepting responsibility, which I applaud. Blaming the proctors is unproductive.
... cheating/blatant rule violation is “ball busting" " ?????? I'm just drawing ... calling @Bamboosprout's proctor a ball buster. Incidences like that happen ...
Next weekend, the weekend we should be learning our scores, is another law school visit day for me. I have a feeling I found the one I prefer so far, but ya never know until you go check it out. Definitely helping me to keep my eye on the ball.