... I wouldn't skip the 60s. And I totally agree with ... couple in the 50s and 60s to get exposure to comparative ... to jump between the 40s-60s, saving the 70+ exams for ...
The 40s are very misleading: LG and RCs are a lot easier and LRs tend to use the same tricks over and over. The 50s and 60s should be fine though but I think LGs in the 80s are more time consuming (more brute-forcing your way through) if not harder.
The 80s LR is no joke. The arguments are similar but the answers are much closer than they were in the 60s. RC on the other hand is pretty consistent throughout. I personally didn't find them that different and found the early ones to be great prep.
> @LSAT_Wrecker said:
> > @mgzero2 said:
> > Yes, but I don't think in those tests. Think more like 62+ being far harder than anything 1-60.
> >
> > They have shifted from basically wanting simple " ...
I ran across a question in the 60s that was basically the combination of two stimuli's that are covered in the CC. The q-type was different but it definitely was interesting.