... kinda sorta covers uptil PT 35 so that still leaves 48 ... June BR Group started at 38 and are doing even all ... maybe we can start on 39 and do increments of 4 ... (39, 43, 47, 51, 55, 59, ...
> @akistotle said:
> I once tried to make a list of all the common flaws.....But then I gave up. :sweat: So here is a partial list:
>
> **5) Causation confusions (correlation-causation flaws)**
> PT20.S1.Q10; ...
... do is I take a 35 minute timed reading comprehension section ... then did 19-38 almost twice; currently at RC 35 for my ... , and once I get to 38 I plan to start at ... this method (don't have 39-41).
>
> ...
... do is I take a 35 minute timed reading comprehension section ... then did 19-38 almost twice; currently at RC 35 for my ... , and once I get to 38 I plan to start at ... this method (don't have 39-41).
> >
... do is I take a 35 minute timed reading comprehension section ... then did 19-38 almost twice; currently at RC 35 for my ... , and once I get to 38 I plan to start at ... this method (don't have 39-41).
> > > ...
... do is I take a 35 minute timed reading comprehension section ... then did 19-38 almost twice; currently at RC 35 for my ... , and once I get to 38 I plan to start at ... this method (don't have 39-41).
> > > ...
If anyone wants to review PT 68 with me tomorrow (Friday) over google hangout/skype. private message me and we can get started. Logical reasoning, both sections.