... you need is a proper analysis of the reasoning for arguments ... explanations/corroborating evidence for a strengthen/weaken, whereas you'll look ...
... which direction you have to strengthen the argument.
... good. But this wouldn't strengthen our argument about neutrality. ... just based on a mechanical analysis. But even on the ... the passage, then we will strengthen our conclusion.
I took a PT last Saturday and based from the question stem analysis of the test grader (extremely helpful guys), flaw questions gave me the most trouble. What is the best way to approach them?
Anyone having a hard time changing answers during the Blind Review? I find myself biased toward the initial answer chosen and convince myself to stick with the original choice regardless if it turns out to be right or not...
Can someone please explain briefly the differences of these three LR question types and how we should approach each type? Just a brief, helpful, cheatsheet type of explanation would be great. Thanks!!
Hi guys! So I just purchased the Cambridge drill packets for NA/strengthen/weaken questions and I wanted to know where in the pdfs you can find the difficulty level. Thanks!