HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| bi | 247 | 372 |
| conditional | 2.7K | 4.4K |
| not | 65.2K | 113.9K |
| both | 9.5K | 11.7K |
-
In out/grouping board set up with complex not both condition?Not sure how to word this but; how do you all set up your in-out board to represent a not both rule when the rule has an and/or statement in it. …
... rule was just a simple bi-conditional then you could represent A ... . In one game trigger the conditional -when A is in, and ... you want to fail the conditional -A is out. Apply this ... -
Two Logical IndicatorsQuestion: in the sentence, "If you’re not greedy, you’re not a business school student" the two different conditional indicators confuse me: if I use…
... that "If" overpowers "not", **and "not" is merely a negation ... and not a logical indicator?**
... a negation. "Not both" is one but "not" on its own ... I've translated sentences both ways just to test ... up picking the one not picked in the ... -
Cleaning up Logic GamesHey! So I have kind of hit a plateau with LG. I am averaging around a -8 timed, but in BR I am consistently -0 to -2. I know I can do pretty much …
... full proofing if you have not done so or completed it ... control & focus on constraints, not both rules, restrictions = gets you to ... -
Could anyone help me with this conditional conundrum?So I've been studying for lsat for some time now and i always had this question i couldn't sort out in my head. For certain describe the flaw questi…
If the NC is the only NC of the SC then it's a bi-conditional. -
Are "noth both" and "neither nor" equivalent?Q7 here: https://7sage.com/lesson/inout-game-1-questions-part-1/ Are "noth both" and "neither nor" equivalent?
neither nor = not this and not that, so yes. it essentially means "not both". -
Are "noth both" and "neither nor" equivalent?Q7 here: https://7sage.com/lesson/inout-game-1-questions-part-1/ Are "noth both" and "neither nor" equivalent?
...
I don't have both a brother and a sister ... specifically "not A _and_ not B", while "not both" is "not A _or_ not B", ... which leaves open the possibility of "not ... A and not B" but does not require it. -
"either or" "not both"**Stmt**: Either A or B is in the forest **Question**: Is "either or" and "exclusive or" here ? **My Answer**: No, because atleast 1 has to b…
... " if it doesn't say "not both." But I think they usually ... -
Splitting in/out games with biconditionalsHi all. Sorry if this is something JY has directly spoken to in lessons, as I just have a free account here. But I was wondering: would it be safe to…
... of any game with a bi-conditional rule where I find that ... -
THE ONLYHow would you diagram “the only thing you need for A is B ” and “the only way to have C is through D”? Are these two the same statements? I’m sta…
... one, is a bi-conditional. Thoughts?
No bi-conditional in either one ... -
Huge news for for August FlexWe will now allow test takers to use a regular or mechanical pencil, or a pen, while taking the LSAT-Flex. You will still need to show your writing u…
This is all great news. Now, is the pens/pencil rule an "either or" rule or a "not both" rule?
Would be so helpful to create your master LG diagram in pen and then use the pencil to fill in & erase for the questions. -
always apart - why not double not arrow?In a rule like "Either J or K are selected, but not both are selected" in an In Out Game, why is it represented as J<->not K and not J double not arr…
... , **but not both** " means, one or the other, _never_ both. Not both has a ... ;
/J /K (both out, minimum of 0 satisfied ... typically when you see a "Not Both" you should immediately recognize ... that the sufficient is not negated and the necessary ... -
always apart - why not double not arrow?In a rule like "Either J or K are selected, but not both are selected" in an In Out Game, why is it represented as J<->not K and not J double not arr…
... "either J or K, **but not both**", wouldn't **world 1** also ... -
always apart - why not double not arrow?In a rule like "Either J or K are selected, but not both are selected" in an In Out Game, why is it represented as J<->not K and not J double not arr…
... the end, it becomes a not both rule, not an "or" rule. Check ... />
https://7sage.com/lesson/not-both-v-or-truth-tables-longer ... /
https://7sage.com/lesson/not-both-v-or-truth-tables/
always apart - why not double not arrow?In a rule like "Either J or K are selected, but not both are selected" in an In Out Game, why is it represented as J<->not K and not J double not arr…
... qualify as an "**or, but not both**" rule? In that case, ... or K are selected, but not both are selected" translates into ** ... ) cannot represent "**either or, but not both**".
In **J ... or K are selected, but not both are selected".
...always apart - why not double not arrow?In a rule like "Either J or K are selected, but not both are selected" in an In Out Game, why is it represented as J<->not K and not J double not arr…
@bruhhhhhh Hey you're totally right! I was overlooking the "or but not both", so you're definitely correct in stating that world 1 is not possible. Thank you :)Either Or - Can it be both?If you have a rule that says for example either P or L will be selected and you write the rule as /P->L and /L->P, could both L and P be selected?
Yes, having BOTH is a possibility. I look ... there's a 'not' (/) at the end then NOT BOTH is possible [A ... a 'positive' (not a not ;p) at the end, then BOTH is possible ...Either Or - Can it be both?If you have a rule that says for example either P or L will be selected and you write the rule as /P->L and /L->P, could both L and P be selected?
Yes. Unless the rule states that either P or L, but not both. P and L can both be selected.PT21.S2.Q20 - Ann will either take a leave of absence or quit her jobFor Logic games, either or is diagrammed as /A--->B, but what about for logical reasoning? Leave of absence----> /quit or /Leave of absence----> q…
For that question even though they don't say "not both", you want a biconditional, as you cant take a leave of absence and also quit. So: Q ↔ /LHaving issues with differentiating game board types when doing logic games?Im currently having issues pertaining to Logic Games. I'm having issues in terms of which game board type I would apply depending on the stimulus. I'…
... "Either C or E, but not both, is selected".
As ... things together). The language might not always imply dividing things up ... look for indicators of both. They're not mutually exclusive (like you ... games are a mix of both). This might sound obvious, ...How Long?I have been studying for the LSAT for quite some time now and I have yet to get -0 on a new section of LG games. I can easily get -0 on sections I ha…
... me it was either but not both rules). LG is closest you ...Posting on Behalf of a 7Sage User: 4 Groups Mixed Translations Flashcards**[I am posting on behalf of a 7Sage user. Please feel free to leave your comments below. Thank you for your help!]** "From 4 Groups Mixed Transla…
"Not both" and "none" are both Group 4.
Let' ... s start with "Not both /S and O".
Anyone have tips for Advanced In/Out Games?Hi everyone, I am planning on taking the LSAT Flex in a few weeks, and I find that I struggle with In/Out Advanced games. Does anyone have any tip…
One other question that just popped into my head was which words trigger the biconditionals? Is it always anything that contains "not both," "except," "not otherwise," and "if and only if?" I cannot think of any others that have popped up.Stumped on this Conditional Reasoning example!Struggling to understand the "not both" rule for a logic game. We have two committees and know that P --> /Q and Q--> /P (the not both rule). Now acc…
In an in/out game you could have both out, but not both in. But since this is two different committees, and not simply a question of being on the committee or off the committee, they need to be in separate groups.Stumped on this Conditional Reasoning example!Struggling to understand the "not both" rule for a logic game. We have two committees and know that P --> /Q and Q--> /P (the not both rule). Now acc…
... game you could have both out, but not both in. But since this ... is two different committees, and not simply ...Stumped on this Conditional Reasoning example!Struggling to understand the "not both" rule for a logic game. We have two committees and know that P --> /Q and Q--> /P (the not both rule). Now acc…
... they love chaining together various "not both" rules, so you can't ...I'm such an anxious test-taker, I'm anxious about taking the prep tests...I realize this sounds silly, but please understand I have a lot of anxiety that was 100% cultivated through academia. I currently have a full-time jo…
i also have a lot of anxiety about them! I remember that bi am not perfect and i am not supposed to be perfect and the practice tests are giving me an opportunity to improve on a skill. i also bribe myself with a reward after!7sage/LSATtrainer/tutoring - too much? too little?Hello all! Please be brutally honest, I scored a 161 in 2019 and have decided to retake this June and October (I'm in Asia currently so these are …
Thank you!! I think I just needed to hear that to not feel guilty of only doing one and not both haha! But interesting, I do really enjoy the feedback and data like the PT tracking etc, might subscribe anyway to use that!PT14.S4.Q13 - "Addiction" has been defined as dependence onI’ve spent 40mins on this question. Can someone please help me to see if I’m making sense. At this point, I’m googling everyday vocabulary I come acr…
c: NOT (Addiction -> Dependence & Abuse)< ... prove C (that it's not the case that addiction leads ... 's addiction and NOT Dependence or NOT Abuse or NOT both
cancer ...Diagram Help: If C does not occur, then A and B cannot both occurIf C does not occur, then A and B cannot both occur Would the diagram look like /C > A or B or... /C > /A & /B or are those both wro…
... is, A and B are both out in the world of ... "/C universe" because of the not-both logic.
1. A --> ... )
3. A and B both out *(which is what your ... three worlds inherent in the not-both relationship. If you only wrote ...
