It's more that certain words should be red flags to get you to think in a certain direction rather than guiding you down that path. "At least" is a great example of this since it is a great chart signifier but not a foolproof one.
Don't foolproof in the curriculum and stop doing all the problem sets. Do only enough to get a feel for the topic and then save the rest for your PT phase to shore up any weaknesses.
If you look at the games menu in the app you can see all the categories in one place. Best thing to do is just foolproof those games and watch the videos.
... have you been doing the FoolProof for (not timewise, but how ... give you ~120 games to FoolProof. You don't have to ... that game section to your Fool proofing pile and repeat the ...
I can type much faster than I can write by hand. However, many of my notes consist of conditionallogic. I'm a tad obsessive-compulsive, so finding the proper symbols on Word would be a pain in the butt. That's why I stick to taking notes by hand.
... , which I hadn’t started fool proofing yet, no immediately conspicuous ... a few days in on fool proofing games but I can ... I’m really excited the foolproof method seems to be working ... . So while I’m still fool proofing, I think I’m ...
... any consolation to you, the "conditionallogic" on the LSAT just isn ... literature on the material conditional in philosophy of logic and philosophy of ... company if you find the conditionallogic on the LSAT counterintuitive sometimes ...
Fool proofing will further increase your ... . I’d also recommend supplementing fool proofing by developing a system ... , after the first time I foolproof a game, repeat it again ...