... "this entity X cannot be explained by this other entity Y ... says "entity X cannot be explained"
Answer choice C just ... not being able to be explained by something)
Answer choice ... that say something cannot be explained by something else, A just ...
What type of coding? I know Coursera classes for coding are supposed to be helpful. I took the R programming course, liked the setup, but did feel it has a pretty steep learning curve
@Pacifico said:
As a very broad and general rule, law schools favor LORs from professors while business schools favor LORs from bosses/managers/supervisors that you have had at a job. ... Now if you have been out of school for 5-10 or more years ...
Later later later! There is definitely a shift after PT65 and while it is subtle, you will be thrown a curve ball if you're not prepared by being exposed to the most modern tests.
72 will F your day up if you're not an Analytical Reasoning champion. But, the curve was also slightly adjusted. Case-in-point, you can get 12 wrong for a 170 on PT 72, but only get 11 wrong for a 170 on PT 73 and 74
Hey, on the bright side, I haven't heard one comment yet that the test was "easy." Maybe we'll get a curve better than on PT 72.. where 12 wrong was a 170 and 28 wrong was a 160.
@Legal Babe.. definitely flawed. I am not trying to be a dick, but seriously, you can't really hang your hat on that. Additionally, your particular testing center being empty doesn't do anything.. the curve is based on all like 20,000 test takers.