... is configured based on previous data???? That is ridiculous ...very illogical ... difficulty is from studying the data from experimental sections from past ...
I'm not seeing where people are writing negative things? Am I missing something? People posting data and speculating about the difficulty of an exam certainly can't be the negative things you are referring to, right?
I read on the Cornell application page that most people that retake the LSAT do not see an increase higher than 1 or 2 points. I thought it was an interesting factoid and it stuck with me. I can't speak as to what data/source they were referencing.