... @theravdiaries said:
> Does anyone know ifthe LR section will still ... be more heavily weighted on the ...
YES. This is the critical question for me. LR ... now underweighted compared to the normal LSAT, unless they ...
Hi! Here is the link to the group 3 translation lessons. ... /
Here is where the lessons on "or" specifically begin ... is the link to the beginning of the advanced logic lessons in the ... cover "or" when it is in thesufficient or necessary conditions. https ...
... still a bit confused since the sentence has two universal indicators ... decide which one should be thesufficientcondition. Could you explain your diagraming ... />
Also, how would you diagram the following variation?
"Genetic material ...
You are right she can't buy a vanity, so V.
Failing to satisfy thesufficientcondition makes the rule irrelevant. So, you can't make the inference that she buys a footstool.
... my monitor for the actual test, but does anyone know ifthe touch screen ... reached out to LSAC with the same question and got an ... touchscreen features are approved for the flex!
... my monitor for the actual test, but does anyone know ifthe touch screen ... reached out to LSAC with the same question and got an ... touchscreen features are approved for the flex!
... VolumeSummaryOriginalFormat.aspx
In the above link for US LSAT ... wondering how much of the increase in the number of 165+ ... scorers taking the test multiple times since the earlier flex ... counted in the data or doesit only count the applicants highest ...
... an exception to the rule, isn't it? normally ifthe driver is involved ... is legally required to report the accident except/unless he is ... damage greater than 500 or, if as B states, there was ... 500 or personal injury, then the driver must have been incapable
Thanks for the response, mnkim. My issue is the conclusion is about any apartment with "a balcony". But this can't trigger thesufficientcondition in the second premise, which states "only three-bedroom apartments _have balconies._ "
This would be HUGE if they did it haha, but you can kind of work around it by taking the exam on Lawhub first and.. yeah.. It won't have time stamps, but it kind of works.
to negate a conditional allow thesufficientcondition but deny the necessary. So the statement above is ~intended-->~pleasure; negate by allowing ~intended --->pleasure then see what happens.