HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| existential | 164 | 242 |
| and | 133.5K | 409.6K |
| universal | 254 | 355 |
| qualifiers | 27 | 30 |
-
Valid Argument FormsI'm just going through the lesson on Valid Argument Forms now and I was wondering for which questions are the existential quantifiers relevant? I gu…
... valid argument forms have both existential and universal statements. For example look ... parts are the existential statements, and the universal statements are the ... 's are B's and all B's are ...
And also All implies most, and most implies some ... -
Structure of arguments.Hey everyone, I was looking for some guidance from the "more experienced" users of the website. Is it worth learning the logical structures of argume…
... familiar with contra-positives, validity, existential and universal quantifiers, etc. will not only ... on most LG and LR sections on PTs and the real test ... -
Thank you 7Sage!!Hi guys, I’ve mostly been a lurker on the forum, but now that my cycle is officially over, I wanted to share a little bit about my LSAT journey and m…
> @UnicornFarts said:
> @Bamboosprout Ah, sorry that note was more meant for the LR and LG sections. Should have been more specific. Hope that clears things up!
Ahhh, so you meant the existential and universal quantifiers? -
Thank you 7Sage!!Hi guys, I’ve mostly been a lurker on the forum, but now that my cycle is officially over, I wanted to share a little bit about my LSAT journey and m…
... more meant for the LR and LG sections. Should have been ... ; Ahhh, so you meant the existential and universal quantifiers?
Yup ... -
LR Study Guides ThreadI was wondering if we could upload our study guides in this post for those taking the June and upcoming LSATs can always come back to this.
... Therefore, some astronauts are brave and smart.
LAWGIC
existential are before the universal qualifiers).
Interestingly, ... Now, take that bucket and drop the whole thing ...
As a corollary and since the “some” statement is ... -
Existential vs Universal QuantifiersI should clarify I am confused about the negations! How does it result that from a statement such as "All cats are black" to Neg Some cats /black O…
I should clarify I am confused about the negations! How does it result that from a statement such as "All cats are black" to Neg Some cats /black OR (this is the one I'm confused about)... cats and /black. I don't understand the "and"? -
PT1-S4-Q24- "Although all contemporary....."I really struggled to correctly diagram the stimulus, specifically the second premise. The second premise tells us that "only a small portion of CA c…
... looking at PowerScore's explanation and they diagramed this premise as ... determine the presence of an existential or universal relationship.
Any ... -
WHY are these statements valid or invalid? (some and most qualifiers)1) Some customers prefer vanilla to chocolate and no customer has no preference in the matter. Therefore, most customers prefer chocolate. 2) Most…
... customers prefer vanilla to chocolate and no customer has no preference ... customers order chocolate ice cream, and most customers get toppings. All ... offered a free extra cherry, and less than half of those ... offered a free extra cherry, and less than half of those ... -
confused with groups for necessary and sufficiency and more qualifiersHey guys, sorry for asking but does anyone have a spreadsheet or any advice on the group 1, 2 and 3 groups for the necessary and sufficient condition…
... on the group 1, 2 and 3 groups for the necessary ... conditions. I often get confused and as a result I end ... -
PT68.S3.Q24 - In the Riverview Building, every apartmentSo this question is easy enough when I take a moment to write out the logic. Even so, I'd like some advice on how to attempt this without enough time…
... argument. Then I go to existential vs universal quantifiers. For example, the ... got me down to C and E. I quickly checked C ... and realized it was right and moved on. Hopefully ... -
PT68.S3.Q24 - In the Riverview Building, every apartmentSo this question is easy enough when I take a moment to write out the logic. Even so, I'd like some advice on how to attempt this without enough time…
... . Then I go to existential vs universal quantifiers. For example, the ... got me down to C and E. I quickly checked ... C and realized it was right and moved on. ... I did the first step and got rid of B, ... not (something) in there. And even if I hadn't ... -
WebinarA little while ago I was on here and people were talking about "nicole.hopkins" webinar on her reading comprehension strategy. Does anybody have the …
... class that has some property and universal is a logical constant which ... to the first idea of existential preceding universal quantifiers. This won't ... the existential precedes the universal since there is a shared condition and the ... -
Recommended formal logic textbooks?<i>Hey 7Sagers, Had someone write in with a question I thought you could help out with! Here it is:</i> I was just wondering if you could let m…
... logic such as: argument structures, universal qualifiers etc. but don't get ... -
The Pencil Thread (7Sage style)My research indicates that the favorite LSAT pencil is between these three contenders: 1) The Black Ticonderogas, ~$6 for 24 (http://www.amazon.co…
... are the Mirado black warriors and Universal standard #2
I like ... -
The Pencil Thread (7Sage style)My research indicates that the favorite LSAT pencil is between these three contenders: 1) The Black Ticonderogas, ~$6 for 24 (http://www.amazon.co…
... are the Mirado black warriors and Universal standard #2
I like ... these a few months back and felt like I was writing ... -
Some statementsHey im still confused after reviewing the CC again I know a some statement can be reversibly read but is there a way to negate it? For example:…
... a universal topic. That is most students come to sites and ... there are different types, methods and PURPOSES of logic. The ... to mention this is not universal!
Notice I used ... reasoning. This implies a universal topic and universal concepts at play. -
PT31.S3.Q23 - although finalismhttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-31-section-3-question-23/ would it be a good way to think alternative to JY's explanation that answer cho…
... .e., the use of the existential vs. universal quantifier.
That ... -
No April cancellation yet?!!??When the first quarantine orders were given two weeks ago, LSAC cancelled March quite promptly. I think they cancelled the morning of, at least befor…
... . I have a score and was planning to do a ... to that school last year and ....no dice. I'm ... addendum (even though its obvious and universal) and show proof of my past ... they'd get their students and fill their seats with ... ) ? What are some thoughts and feedback. -
⚖ Official August 2020 LSAT-Flex Discussion Thread ⚖Hey 7Sagers, Here's the official August 2020 LSAT-Flex Discussion Thread. <center><font color="red">**Please keep all discussions of the August…
... flagged Q's right and hit our goals! It ... away in games 2 and 3 that were crucial ... Theories of Dark matter and universal expansion - hard and time consuming
... the Greek architects question and PR was a bit ... a time crunch. Between -1 and -5.
... -
What's something you enjoy about the LSAT?Hi everyone! I was thinking that it'd be a great idea to share at least one thing we enjoy about the LSAT and/or the process of studying for this exa…
... what my weaknesses are and working on those areas. ... They're so interesting and you get to read ... was at the park and saw some lichens on ... a tree and remembered the passage that ... one about Freud and Marx as well and universal determinism.There are ... -
A confusion relates to Lawgic and Sufficent Assumption QuestionsI am very confused with a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes annoying in Assumpt…
... with a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes ... " implies "A-most->B" and "A some B". So, we ... -> Go home for lunch." and also implies
"No part ... -
A specific Lawgic Confusion and Assumption QuestionsI am very confused with a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes annoying in Assumpt…
... with a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes ... " implies "A-most->B" and "A some B". So, we ... -> Go home for lunch." and also implies
"No part ... -
Qualifiers and Valid/Invalid ArgumentsHey everyone! I've been reviewing valid and invalid argument forms this afternoon, and I'm having a bit of trouble so any help would be greatly appre…
... forms in terms of qualifiers and inferences that can be ... giving me a better and helpful perspective when evaluating ... ; some + most = no inferences; and most + most = inferences. First, ... I am translating incorrectly and would appreciate someones correction. ... -
Logical Reasoning Philosophy classI'm wondering if anyone has taken a philosophy course in logical reasoning. If you have, how did you find it? Did you feel it gave you a stronger fou…
... made translating/completing arguments using universal and existential qualifiers on the LSAT much easier ... -
Valid Argument Forms 6-8Okay so i was watching the video where JY tells us how to distinguish between Valid and Invalid argument forms and at the end he gave us a little tri…
... forms, the existential statements appear first and then the universal statements.
universal statements appear first and then the existential statements.
universal statements rather than existential statements. So can ... -
Negating/denying Universal quantifiersHey, I know that there were lessons on denying existential quantifiers, but I couldn't find one for the universal quantifiers... Can you please…
Hey,
I know that there were lessons on denying existential quantifiers, but I couldn't find one for the universal quantifiers...
Can you please tell me how to deny statements with existential quantifiers?
Thanks -
Understanding why "some are not" is the negation of "all"In the existential quantifiers lessons, JY explains how to negate statements with the universal quantifier "all." The conclusion was that "some are n…
... existential quantifiers lessons, JY explains how to negate statements with the universal ... in the new set and some contributors suggested the ... After diagramming the all statement and its negation, I think ... cats which are pretentious and not pretentious must add ... -
Can a NA answer have a "most" existential quantifier?I always get confused between the NA answers that states A most B and a subtle conditional (the correct answer). During the BR, I am able to correct …
... that states A most B and a subtle conditional (the correct ... />
I know that other existential quantifiers, such as some, can ... -
Tips for Quickly Eliminating Answer Choices (PR, Strengthen, Assumptions)Hey All, Over the past few months, since I began my LSAT journey, I've accumulated a few tips on how to quickly eliminate answer choices for Paral…
... ), and E (again, this is an existential conclusion. Our conclusion is universal). We ... are then left with B and ... C, which each have universal conclusions:
B ... -
valid arguements and indicators ..how does this appy?Hello 7Sagers, I am in the process of completing the core curriculum and i had a question about the LR portion of the circular. I am memorizing un…
... of completing the core curriculum and i had a question about ... am memorizing universal indicators, valid arguments , invalid arguments, and some and more relationships ... i should apply these things and how they come together.
