HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| explanation | 4K | 5K |
| must | 4.7K | 6.3K |
| be | 77K | 135.1K |
| distinguished | 30 | 31 |
| from | 42.5K | 61.5K |
| justification | 106 | 123 |
| every | 12.1K | 15.1K |
| human | 841 | 1.2K |
| acti | 0 | 0 |
-
How to Improve My Logic ReasoningHi everyone, I'm taking the LSAT on Feb 19 and I'm start to panic a bit. For each practise LSAT I've taken my Logical Reasoning scores hover aroun…
... would be non stop drilling LR. Especially questions from my ... an LR section can be immensely fruitful as well. ... . You're thinking should be aligned as such 'this ... or 'this is a must be true question, to guarantee ... to success I must do this this and ... -
Retaking in 2017, but burned through PTsSo what are your thoughts? Have I really set myself back for getting from my official 159 to a 165 retake by using so many PTs? Well! I have to sa…
... with or taken almost every PT from 52 through 75.
from what I can glean ... them) to PT and drill from. While there are clear ... plenty of things to be learned from the older tests. If ... don't do and foolproof every LG that LSAC has ... -
"Evaluate" LR questions in the 7sage Curriculum?Hi 7sagers, I was just wondering if "Evaluate" (as in, "Which of the following would be most helpful to know in evaluating the argument above?" or…
... can't be more specific than that because it varies from question ... , and the other four answers must be irrelevant to the argument.
RC: How do you make your memory better for those fine detail question?OK, so my battle with RC and been brutal, long, and very emotionally draining. I originally was going like -16, now I'm going -5ish. In RC I have s…
... is no way to be 100% sure on every question, so don ... 't be afraid to concede ... I took a lot away from JY's "Memory Method" ... a lot of good tactics from Powerscore's RC Bible. ... my mind and approach RC from a clear perspective, it ...Conditional vs CasualHi, I am having a hard time differentiating between a cause and effect and a conditional statement. Would anyone have tips or tricks?
... precise, this might explain why Must Be True, Most Strongly Supported, Sufficient ... involves inferring general laws (hypothesis) from particular instances (phenomenon). Clearly, going ... from particular to general is not ...JY's AvatarAt this point, most of us have spent many hours watching videos. Above these wonderful videos is JY's family avatar. BUT WHAT IS IT? Is he on a j…
HAHAHAHAHAHA I think about this every time I click on a ... new lesson in CC. Every. TIME. Because his awesomeness is ... />
Or, he could be watching (from a safe distance) some fools ...PTB.S2.G2 - an apartment building has five floorsIn the third rule, it says that if y is not in the park if either L or O is in the park, but then on the explanation, the sub game boards, he says th…
... of possible events coming from that rule we_** fulfill ... does that exclude Tom Brady from being the greatest ever? ... know that L and O must be in.
F ... there: 2 steps away from where the question stem ... Y is in, then M must be out.
...PT34.S3.Q03 - sigatoka disease drastically reducesHi Guys, I am having a bit of difficulty with this question. https://7sage.com/lesson/banana-epidemics-na-question/ https://7sage.com/lsat_e…
... , in true necessary assumption form must be true.
Think about ... total.
We move from a statistic about a part ...PT34.S3.Q03 - sigatoka disease drastically reducesHi Guys, I am having a bit of difficulty with this question. https://7sage.com/lesson/banana-epidemics-na-question/ https://7sage.com/lsat_e…
... plantations are in locations isolated from fungicides
Conclusion: Most ... my thoughts are then it must mean that since small banana ... they are susceptible, there must be more large plantation band crops ... it could be that they will soon be exposed to ...PT5.S3.Q20 - a certain viral infectionI think I understand why B is right, since middle ear infections are not defined as being bacterial infections in the stimulus. Probably just assumed…
... is the takeaway for me from the stim: The author never ... of the middle ear infection must be caused by something other than ... can see why (D) could be an attractive answer choice, but ...Canada/LSAC GPAHey everyone, My school in Canada only gives out percentage grades on my transcript. They also have a chart that converts your percentage grade to…
... , Canadian grades are really different from US grades.
... adcoms should be familiar with how Canadian grades differ from US grades ... a 3.75 from a school like Toronto must be worth more than ... a 3.8 from some US ...PT5.S3.Q20 - a certain viral infectionI think I understand why B is right, since middle ear infections are not defined as being bacterial infections in the stimulus. Probably just assumed…
... of information that is missing from the stimulus. Since we know ... , we can assume that there must be a different cause for the ...Lawgic translation"It's always sunny in Philadelphia" Someone please explain to me how Sunny is the Necessary Condition and Philadelphia is the Sufficient Condition…
... it is Tuesday, then I must be working". Expanding referential phrasing can ... necessary conditions can be tricky at first. Speaking from experience, I found ...PT55.S1.Q15 - Zach's Coffeehouse schedules free poetryI have a question about "almost every Wednesday" in PT55 S1 Q15. https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-55-section-1-question-15/ When I read t…
... />
I would steer away from viewing "most" as containing a ... "**_some are not_**" section in must be true questions unless the LSAT ... mean by this is that from my experience, if we have ...PT17.S3.Q20 - in order to succeedHi all, I am quite puzzled by the answer to this question altogether. The answer to this is answer choice A (circular reasoning of the first sente…
... : . If I am understanding your explanation correctly, the argument structure is ... but still this seems to be off from answer choice A, which ... sets out to conclude would be the main conclusion that the ... bit confused. Any feedback would be great!Have I Reached my Score Potential??Hey guys, To give some background info for my prep, I had a 140 diagnostic and I studied full-time for about 2.5 years. I went through Tesmasters,…
... build a network. I'm from Southern California and I may ... so applying regionally may not be a bad idea. Although its ... in your work life. You must be a great person to ...Have I Reached my Score Potential??Hey guys, To give some background info for my prep, I had a 140 diagnostic and I studied full-time for about 2.5 years. I went through Tesmasters,…
... build a network. I'm from Southern California and I may ... so applying regionally may not be a bad idea. Although its ... work life. You must be a great person to be around haha.
from NYC who likes to drink ...LSAT Prep Low PointWe all hit high points and low points in our LSAT journey. At the moment, I am devastated, drained, and confused on how to proceed. I want this more …
... time and set myself to be more susceptible to anxiety). Detail ... 'm extremely interested in. After every paragraph, I would ask myself ... ,' 'if this happens, then _this_ must be the case,' etc.), describe a ... out at all, it would be best to share.PT3.S2.Q04 - a work of architectureHello guys, Can someone please map out the logic of this argument and show how we can properly infer answer choice B? I am utterly confused :( …
... /> I may not be perfect with my explanation, but I will try ... functional for public use, architecture must be unobtrusive
- meaning that architecture ...Beliefs v. FactsI've only come across this type of flaw a few times, but I'd like to understand the structure behind it. The explanation and example offered in the c…
... function as modal constructions and must be monitored (see what-a ... that p" bars us from inferring anything from p. That is, ... the context "John believes..." from outside, we can rephrase:< ... _Quantifying in_ switches the statement from the de dicto version (whole ...Logic Games : [Never Together/Always Together] v. [Not Both] Rule ConfusionHello, During In-Out Games, I am consistently getting confused between the Not Both Rule and the Biconditional (Always Together/Never Together) R…
... restriction of all games pieces must be used exactly once, between exactly ... quote "out" category, meaning "not be paid", (we only see Thursday ... thoughts and turn them into human language, so I hope I ... If it says 7 bills must be paid exactly once between exactly ...PT45.S1.Q24 - in criminal proceedingsStill trying to tease out the stimulus on this one. I don't understand what the two different DNA tests are or how they are confused or what the assu…
... caution_**. This construction would be commensurate with the premise ... **_does not_** match the sample from the crime.
... for instance, in regular every day conversation, if someone ... think it would be perfectly reasonable in every day parlance and ...Internalizing LG Rules More QuicklyWhen taking a timed Logic Game, it's so easy to just write out the rules, look for quick inferences, and dive into the questions with what, at the ti…
... the condition that each team "must include at least one A ... and M cannot be together
+ Team 2 must include at least ... certain obligations we must fulfill or avoid on every valid construct we ... at each and every rule as something a world must "pass" in ...Does anyone else think that the recent PT LR Qs punish prephrases?Ok, I might be exaggerating when I say "punish prephrases," but I noticed that the prephrases, especially for the flaw/ assumption type questions, do…
... my prephrase had to be that specific. It really ... different in age -> must be volcanos. If not a volcano ... specific my prephrase should be and the relationship between ... your pre-phrase should be once you know that ... that. I do think from what I can read that ...PT1.S4.Q21 - a society in which there are many crimesI am Completely stumped on this question. I am not sure if I am correctly negating the statement nor understanding the some relationship here Stim…
... the sufficient and necessary reversed from the stimulus.
must be true according to the contrapositive ... L; incorrect; The contrapositive from the stimulus states that If ... 't know from the stimulus. There could be many crimes ...PT24.S3.Q10 - all material bodies are divisibleI'm having trouble understanding the translation for the conditional logic to this question. `All material bodies are divisible into parts,` Ma…
... allow the conclusion to follow from the stated premises. This ... assumption questions will invariably be unproven from what we are given ... us what we already know from valid argument form 3: ... I hope this more complete explanation helps.
Don't hesitate ...PT27.S4.Q05 - ticks attach themselves to host animalsWhy is answer (B) wrong? So, I understand that: 1. Ticks drop off host when fed to capacity, and not before. 2. Deer ticks feeding off white-f…
... sunset, NOT that they must drop off every day.
So ... for X period of time, be that 1 second or 1 ... understanding that each and every day a tick must fall off before ... in the stimulus), then it must be that even a tick that ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... elements in the "not both" MUST be selected. The initial thread did ... not both." Your biconditional would be the case if it would ... not both," which renders your explanation accurate. I was just being ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... this case, OR seems to be operating more as a comma ... example you provide would indeed be different from the one I presented ... the "can" part introduced might be more suitable for grappling with ... -v-or-truth-tables-longer-explanation/
https://7sage.com/ ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... attaching an assumption (that "must" is a necessary part ... but not both" = It must be true that we "can" have ... one, and it must be true that we cannot have ... or juice, but it must be true that we "can" ... vs. will issue seems separate from the "or, but not ...
