I have seen a few questions in which NA is actually an SA or a weaker form of SA ( --> in SA to -- most --> in NA, otherwise the same). I understand that NA and SA has different logical relationship with a valid argument (Any SA -> VA -> All ...
The assumption here and with every “Cost ... structure is often used for **NecessaryAssumption** questions. The NA simply stating ... the above one, except the assumption is that there is not ...
What is the primary difference between NecessaryAssumption Qs and Sufficient Assumption Qs? Both are required to make the argument valid but I'm not quire sure how the answer choices differ.
When you’re doing a necessaryassumption question and an answer choice seems like it would be the answer to a must be true / most strongly supported question does that mean you should eliminate it?
I thought the argument was a causal conclusion because of “increases.” Since the argument goes from correlation to causation, isn’t one of the assumptions that there is a causal relationship between watching TV and obesity among North-American school ...
I'm looking at the Flaw-Descriptive Weaking questions and NecessaryAssumption questions on the CC. Each of them has about 20 example questions and 20 PSETs. Is it recommended to do all of them? If not, how many are recommended?