HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| items | 428 | 532 |
| removed | 742 | 859 |
-
Letter of Recommendation...RecommendationsSo I've found myself in a bit of a pickle with regards to letters of rec. One of my own making, but still. I am nearly six years removed from college…
... . I am nearly six years removed from college at this point ... -
Relationships in logic gamesGuys, am I understanding this correctly? Basically, the letters in lg have a relationship only if they are mentioned in the rules, ie, “this comes be…
... />
Sometimes there usually floater items that don't have any ... -
Relationships in logic gamesGuys, am I understanding this correctly? Basically, the letters in lg have a relationship only if they are mentioned in the rules, ie, “this comes be…
... the variables i.e. the items we are categorizing in a ... -
Relationships in logic gamesGuys, am I understanding this correctly? Basically, the letters in lg have a relationship only if they are mentioned in the rules, ie, “this comes be…
... the variables i.e. the items we are categorizing in a ... -
Core Curriculum Study BuddyHi, I am looking for a study buddy that would like to talk overall strategy and daily insights working on the core curriculum. I am not completel…
... up so the server was removed. There are still study groups ... -
Chronograph Watch allowed?Hi, Does anyone know if a Chronograph watch is allowed on the test? They have analog automatic versions(aka nondigital). I am about to start practic…
... June 2017 tickets (under restricted items) and not in the proctor ... -
Chronograph Watch allowed?Hi, Does anyone know if a Chronograph watch is allowed on the test? They have analog automatic versions(aka nondigital). I am about to start practic…
... June 2017 tickets (under restricted items) and not in the proctor ... -
PT21.S2.Q19 - spectroscopic analysis has revealed - super hard NA q.Hello, This is an NA question that I have been trying to grasp. It's REALLY hard. I will explain how I can justify the to myself and I would be…
... tells us the relationship between items without telling us the quantity ... -
Should law schools do away with the LSAT?https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/12/13/study-high-standardized-test-scores-dont-translate-to-better-cognition http://worklife.columbia.ed…
... happen if the LSAT were removed and not replaced by another ... -
Analytics QuestionWhen scoring a test that has a question labelled as *Item removed from scoring* do we leave it empty when inputting our answers? Does the analytics t…
The analytics will automatically remove it from scoring if it has been officially removed it from scoring. Input it as normal. -
Breaking into new PT's...wowHey everyone, Just wanted to see if anyone had any advice for adjusting to the newer RC. I have been taken relatively older (Pre60's) PT's and sc…
Weird Games (virus game etc.)I am SUPER concerned about getting a weird game on the sep LSAT. I have the "miscellaneous" cambridge packet with all of the weird games but each is …
... employees working on 4 different items and how they pass them ...Weird Games (virus game etc.)I am SUPER concerned about getting a weird game on the sep LSAT. I have the "miscellaneous" cambridge packet with all of the weird games but each is …
... employees working on 4 different items and how they pass them ...LOR questionSo, here goes: I graduated a little over 6 years ago and when I think about professors I could get strong LORs from, only one really comes to mind…
... that you are 6 years removed from UG, I don't ...Who should write my LORs?Can you please help me decide on whom to ask for LOR? I graduated undergrad 2012, went to graduate school, graduated 2013. Since then I have been …
... are you. Someone 4 years removed from witnessing your performance and ... in a stretch 3 years - removed from seeing and evaluating your ...Fell off a CliffHello Any advice for my case Last week I took PT 75 and got a 171 and been averaging 170 from PT 70 -76. I recently took LSAT 77 and 78 and …
... BS questions, if any, were removed. If you have a strong ...PT10.S4.Q15 - new legislation would requireI chose B under timed conditions but switched to A in BR. My issue with B is that there are no "potential" criminals here. If B said "nothing sho…
... always at least one layer removed from it's subject in ...Question about Chart vs. Grouping Game board set upHey all, So I realize J.Y's general rule for when to use a chart vs. when to use a standard grouping game board is that if the variables are only …
... significant difference between the repeatable items and the base categories that ... five such categories and five items (repeatable) then I would probably ...Question about Chart vs. Grouping Game board set upHey all, So I realize J.Y's general rule for when to use a chart vs. when to use a standard grouping game board is that if the variables are only …
... significant difference between the repeatable items and the base categories that ... five such categories and five items (repeatable) then I would probably ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Legit LG: sequencing foods, students to projects, investigators to suspects.
LR: 25 and 26 questions - [removed]Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Judge's Opinion RC (holy hard)
LG: [removed] game about interviewing
LR: 3-5 cups of tea is good
(I thought RC was REALLY challenging)Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... ? (My last LR section had [removed] question as the last question ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... ? (My last LR section had [removed] question as the last question ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... 't have any with a removed question.
> @HesusChrist ... ? (My last LR section had [removed] question as the last question ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... 't have any with a removed question.
>
> ... ? (My last LR section had [removed] question as the last question ... ;
>
The [removed] code was added by me ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... 't have any with a removed question.
> >
removed] question as the last question ... ;
>
> The [removed] code was added by me ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... 't have any with a removed question.
> > > ... ? (My last LR section had [removed] question as the last question ... ; >
> > The [removed] code was added by me ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... . I believe the fourth was [removed]. I believe this was the ...
