So for necessary assumptions, the assumptions can be about the context, premise and conclusion? If the negation a statement attacks, say, the context of an argument, would this statement be a necessary assumption? Am I understanding this right??
I can't recall if further more was one of our indicator words. I am getting confused, does furthermore introduced the main conclusion and follow the main premise?
Conclusion: This finding supports (1) ... />
In arriving the first conclusion, the author is making an ... the second conclusion follows well. The second conclusion is based ... not restricted) from this conclusion? The premise is talking ...
... which, I mean can a conclusion be divided between two complete ... create the fully fleshed out conclusion. If so, does the sentence ... be “Sentence 1. +Sentence 2 = conclusion.”
As for this question, could someone please break down the argument structure for me? i'm slightly confused with the 2 sentences that both look like possible conclusions.