I have fool proofed LG 1-35 and I'm still averaging -8 or -10. I think my problem is I didn't do the weird games that showed up 1-20. Should I just do those games i didn't fool proof or should I start over?
Most online resources I’ve read recommend that LG is studied first because it is most learnable and gets your brain wired up for the LSAT best. Is there a disadvantage to starting with LG on 7Sage and is LR first because it’s the largest section(s)?
... I can improve on my LG I will be borderline at ... , that score high on the LG sections, can provide any tips ... how they study or approach LG sections. Thank you in advance ...
... sections in LR, RC, and LG just to get my juices ... dive intensive into something like LG fool proofing for two weeks ... all I do is foolproof LG for two weeks. Then after ... , rusty, and prone to silly mistakes.
... LSAT and honestly miss practicing LG. I figured since I continue ... for anyone struggling with foundational LG skills. I consistently finish this ...
I ... thread "The Four Pillars of LG Consistency" for a reason. Notice ... complicated and long solution. In LG we can often eliminate an ... most of the time. LG has stayed remarkably consistent for ...
... supposed to draw diagrams for LG and couldn't really finish ... I write about RC and LG below, but LR becomes a ... out, or just make careless mistakes. I think my biggest advice ... to one another, what common mistakes I tend to make, and ...
Now that we're officially switching over to digital, how are y'all foolproofing LG? By printing out a bunch of games like before, or by using the digital simulator and scratch paper? Any tips?
... started focusing on improving my LG/RC I was averaging about ... around 2 weeks bringing my LG/RC to a point where ... getting ~2-4 wrong on LG and ~4-5 wrong on ... without seeing my work with LG/RC suffer?
I found ...