Hey guys, does anyone have any suggestions on recognizing when an argument is causal when it does not include key words like "responsible for", "resulted in", or straight up "caused"?
I'm seeing question 22 on on Section 2 in PT 73 being ...
If Larry drives to work in the morning, he will hit traffic. Therefore:
A If Larry hits traffic, it must be morning.
B If Larry drives to work in the afternoon, he will not hit traffic.
C If Larry doesn't hit traffic, it must ...
If some are not X, does this category mean 0-99%? The logical opposite of "all" is "not all" which clearly means 0-99%, but does this mean the same thing logically as "some are not?" Thanks!!!
I thought I had been getting better at LR, I took this section and got -9 which is no better than when I began studying. Kinda discouraging but I think this was a really hard LR section.
Hello! So I’m doing the Premium course and I just completed the weakening and strengthen question types. I got the majority of questions wrong during the explanation portion where there’s a sample question and JY goes through it. Usually I pause the video, ...