Affirming the sufficient triggers
Denying the necessary triggers
Denying the sufficient renders irrelevant and rule falls away
Affirming the necessary renders irrelevant and rule falls away
Hey, it may not be necessary, but it certainly is sufficient. Thanks to certain proclivities that I partook of in college (which I do not regret), my memory is completely shot. :)
... like you're flipping the necessary and sufficient and maybe issues with ... know which logical indicators are necessary or sufficient you can then move ... this as many times as necessary. If you don't and ...
... better than pessimism..." is not necessary to this argument. Would this ... , weaken or reconcile/resolve questions, necessaryassumptions will stay close to the ...
Having a fancy watch is neither a sufficient nor a necessary condition for success on the LSAT. Don't let this marginalia pollute your outlook or stir up bad vibes.
... have confused the necessary condition (B) as a sufficient condition for acquiring ... have confused the sufficient condition (A) as being necessary for the existence ... ; it might have some other sufficient condition.
... , I know sufficiency satisfied and necessary failed are what make conditional ... irrelevant when the necessary is satisfied, or the sufficient is failed) but ...
Remember G3-->Q5, but Q is clearly in 4, so that negates the necessary condition, triggering a negation of the sufficient condition. In other words, G cannot be in 3. That leaves only J and H for slot 3. Hence, answer D