HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| not | 65.4K | 114.3K |
| both | 9.5K | 11.8K |
| rules | 3.3K | 5.3K |
-
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... the RC sections.. That's not something I can fix. I ... to hear that. You are not alone when it comes to ... either RC or LG, but not both, then one of those is ... 'm 29 years old, and not looking to get into a ... -
PT3.S2.Q04 - a work of architectureHello guys, Can someone please map out the logic of this argument and show how we can properly infer answer choice B? I am utterly confused :( …
In order to be both inviting and functional a work ... br /> obtrusive -> not inviting or not functional or not both
having knowledge ... of this if-then relationship is not ... produced buildings that are NOT unobtrusive -
Logic Games : [Never Together/Always Together] v. [Not Both] Rule ConfusionHello, During In-Out Games, I am consistently getting confused between the Not Both Rule and the Biconditional (Always Together/Never Together) R…
... a Never Together from a Not Both Rule is to quickly understand ... "true" In-Out game or not, etc.)? I would love to ... -
I'm not understanding the difference between these two rules X <-> ~Y X -> ~Y Could someone please clear up for me? Thanks!
... "either x or y but not both is in"??
Rule ... : Either X or Y or both are out
Master Game ... : Either X or Y but not both is in
Master Game ... got screwed up and does not show up properly when I ... -
I'm not understanding the difference between these two rules X <-> ~Y X -> ~Y Could someone please clear up for me? Thanks!
... "either x or y but not both is in"??
>
both are out
So ... -
What does "or else" mean in sequencing games?Hey guys, Had a 7Sager email me with a question that I thought you guys could help out with. Here it is: ------------------------------------- …
... on 1 or 7, but not both, although it isn't explicitly ... stated.
Not sure I would've read ... -
BiconditionalsHi guys, I'm going through the biconditional part of the curriculum. Im wondering, for the Or, but not both biconditional, why don't we just write it…
... wondering, for the Or, but not both biconditional, why don't we ... above only accounts for the "not both" part of the sentence. Because ... is out. But it does not mean one of A **or ... -
BiconditionalsHi guys, I'm going through the biconditional part of the curriculum. Im wondering, for the Or, but not both biconditional, why don't we just write it…
... statement A or B but not both like Sami described above. ... B or 2, not B. The "exclusive not both or" means we ... necessity of a variable to not occur (being untrue/false). ... the "exclusive or"/not both variables absent and not both variables present expression, ... -
is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... .wu82" ! Those two statements are not the same thing. If A ... , then not B is represented as A ... ) and A or B, but not both is /A----->B ( /B ... -
advanced formal logic some and most inferenceHi guys, I am confused with a logic inference. According to a book, if A, then not B, can be notated like A-->/B or A<-|->B. However, in 7sage, i…
... -conditional. If A then not B is a not both rule: A ---> ... ; B, for it's not clear ... meaning of this statement does not equate a bi-conditional.
BiconditionalsHi guys, I'm going through the biconditional part of the curriculum. Im wondering, for the Or, but not both biconditional, why don't we just write it…
A -->/B means "not both" so A and B could both be out. If A is OUT, sufficient condition fails and B could be OUT or IN.
A/B means "always apart, never together" so they cannot be out together. If A is OUT, B has to be IN.is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
Edit: Just saw the but not both. They are not the same thing.
not B (A->/B CP ... be
If A is not chosen (/A), now what? Nothing ... free to be chosen or not chosen
If B ... is not chosen (/B), now what? Again, ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... Just saw the but not both. They are not the same thing. < ... /> > If A is not chosen (/A), now what? Nothing ... free to be chosen or not chosen
> If ... B is not chosen (/B), now what? Again ... free to be chosen or not to be Chosen.
...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... of the elements in the "not both" MUST be selected. The initial ... said "A or B, but not both." Your biconditional would be the ... or B is selected, but not both." The way it is stated ... or B is selected, but not both," which renders your explanation accurate ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... item. We also have a not both relationship, which means we cannot ... Well if we diagram the NOT BOTH statement, we get the following ... as well
not both A and B https://www ... />
A or B but not both https://www.wolframalpha.com/input ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... milk or juice, but not both" is not the same thing as "One ... or juice is selected, but not both." The former leaves the possibility ... of not having either, and the latter ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... or B is selected, but not both" in this manner to eliminate ... . And at times, they might not write it that way, which ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... . The "A or B, but both both" is an exclusive or, which ... "A or B, **not both**" the "exclusive or" not the "inclusive or". I ... A, then not B" and "A or B, but not both" as separate ... conditions, are not the same thing.is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... milk or juice, but not both" is not the same thing as ... or juice is selected, but not both.""
The ... A or B, but not both" there is not a possibility or probability ... statement merely reverts to a not both relationship.
I ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... " in the exclusive arena does not mean at least one because ... was saying is LSAC does not tend to use the terminology ... or B is selected, but not both." This is because the latter ... than "A or B, but not both." Anyways, I don't want ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... the exclusive arena does not mean at least one ... B is selected, but not both." This is because the ... "A or B, but not both." Anyways, I don't ... one". "Or, but not both" means one of the options ... a possibility. If we had "not both" by itself (without the ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... of the LSAT), it may not.
Even if this ... is true, it's not mentioned in the curriculum, because ... state, "A or B, but not both" (The LSAT does in fact ... the LSAT. Now, I'm not a logician, so I don ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... state, "A or B, but not both" (The LSAT does in fact ... So "A or B, but not both" = "A is true or B ... is true, but not both". There isn't an assumed ... the logic of "or, but not both". "You can have milk or ... juice, but not both" = It must be true ...Inclusive or exclusive 'or'How do we tell the difference between an inclusive 'or' (group 3 rules) or an exclusive 'or' (can be negated to mean 'and')?
... to pick one of them, not both. (Well, you can try saying ... explicitly stated that it's "not both"). If it says "I'm ... or B or both" unless specifically told "but not both." I saw once ... in Logic Games that says "or both ...Inclusive or exclusive 'or'How do we tell the difference between an inclusive 'or' (group 3 rules) or an exclusive 'or' (can be negated to mean 'and')?
... explicitly stated that it's "not both").
I agree with ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... for "A or B, but not both" the possibility of having NONE ... of A or B is not permissible. That's the whole ... least one" is consistent with both exclusive and inclusive or. By ...PT22.S3.Q24 - if g is assigned to team 1This guy JY shifts from a correct CBT answer choice to a MBT answer choice in the question straight after. I understand why some of the elements migh…
... /> P and Q are a not both relationship, which means only one ..."or" in Sequencing Logic GamesDoing a quick review of concepts that I struggled with early on. I remember the following rule being simple to diagram: L is before M but after…
... M or after L, but not both.
>
> M ... M or after L, but not both". I think you are omitting ..."or" in Sequencing Logic GamesDoing a quick review of concepts that I struggled with early on. I remember the following rule being simple to diagram: L is before M but after…
"or" in Sequencing Logic GamesDoing a quick review of concepts that I struggled with early on. I remember the following rule being simple to diagram: L is before M but after…
... M or after L, but not both.
> as follows:
not both
>
> K ...
