... be terribly concerned. Getting a -0/-1 on LG is only ... of the battle. **_Sustaining_** a -0/-1 across lets say 2 ... set out to score a -0/-1 in each. Last week ... get into gear on PT 3 game 4: I just couldn ...
... . AKA - while accepting a 2.0 GPA may bring a law ... average GPA from a 3.7 to a 3.4 (exaggeration), it ... the median down to a 3.68, if bring it down ... 's median GPA is a 3.86; LSAT median is a ...
... section. Until I am going -0 on games there's really ... section down to only missing -3/-4 per section and LG ... down to -0/-1 you will be right ...
... usually score 0 wrong in Logic Games and around 3 to 5 ... best performance, I had only 3 wrong in this section. However ... significantly much better with usually 0 to 2 wrong.
> ...
... ; I am doing 0 LG and -1 to -3 on RC. However ... , for LR I range from 0/-1 ... to -5/-6 but usually -3 each section ... , level 2 50 seconds, level 3 65 seconds, level 4/5 ...
... />
You should take more than 3 practice tests to gauge your ... from about -8 to a -0 LG score almost every time ... into Harvard - one took it 3 times (but had the benefit ... of a 3.9+ GPA) and another took ...
... idea I'm talking below 3.0. It's abysmal.
& ... absolutely no difference between a 3.2 and 2.5. They ... An applicant with a 2.0 has a significantly less chance ... with a 3.2. An applicant with a 2.0 pulls a ... s 25% percentile GPA is 3.56. According to what you ...
Your LSAT can do a lot. Prob the best splitter story I know is Nicole she was a sub 3.0 UGPA and a 170 LSAT and is now a very successful 2L at Northwestern. It a lot easier to be a High LSAT low GPA than the reverse as far as splitters go.
... idea I'm talking below 3.0. It's abysmal. ... no difference between a 3.2 and 2.5. ... applicant with a 2.0 has a significantly less chance ... a 3.2. An applicant with a 2.0 pulls ... 25% percentile GPA is 3.56. According to what ... you are a 3.2 or a 1.0, will not ...
... is likely that a 2.0 will be looked at with ... a jaundiced eye than a 3.2, and give the choice ... , I'd think that the 3.2 would win out 99 ... the difference was, say 3.54 and 3.49. Such minuscule differences ...
... is likely that a 2.0 will be looked at ... the difference was, say 3.54 and 3.49. Such minuscule differences ... (this is impossible), the 3.2 would get chosen over ... the 2.0 every time. But there ... the application in the 2.0's favor, such as addendum ...
i would agree with the above advice^ if you can go -0 on the other games you can probably go 2/4 or 3/6 on an oddball game unless you have a super bad day which would leave you with around -4 total anyways.
... game until you get -0 on it well under ... done around 4 minutes going -0.
>
& ... > It took me about 3 months and over 600 game ... to start approaching a consistent -0 on timed sections. ... that fool proofing requires -0 on the LG. However, ...
... game until you get -0 on it well under ... done around 4 minutes going -0.
> > 3 months and over 600 game ... to start approaching a consistent -0 on timed sections. ... that fool proofing requires -0 on the LG. However, ...
... thesis:)
>
> (3) Well, once you're pretty ... don't do more than 3-4 like this.
> ... 30 min with (-2 to 0--usually -1 unfortunately; always make ...