@ Jonathan Wang: I'd prefer to see live videos of you parsing out complex conditional statements. Perhaps, parallel reasoning, parallel flawed reasoning, sufficient assumption, and pseudo sufficient assumption videos? Thanks!
... only to show that reducing speed limits does not protect lives ... the argument was that reducing speed limits is "not worthwhile" or ... undercut the argument that reducing speed limits is "not worthwhile".
... than it is by driving speed. The primary determinant could be ... the road than by driving speed, the argument could still work ... the argument jumped from "speed limits" to "driving speed", and I figured ...
... readings on the relationship between speed and time on the road ... leads to the other: slower speed limit must mean more time ... possible - even likely - that slower speed limits would yield lower emissions ... be lower with a lower speed limit. That's what the ...
Oh my gosh- how could I have not made that connection between speed and driving time?! Thanks so much for your explanations, Sic- you identified my problem perfectly!
Graeme Blake touched upon this (Think he used to work with 7Sage). Check his link out: http://lsatprep180.com/the-lsat-and-reading-speed-change-headline/