I concur. By the way, I gambled last time I took the test. My picture was a year old and I didn't get a hair cut in that year. :open_mouth: I had it pulled back in case. But I don't think my proctors even looked at the picture.
Yeah on my ticket it says "Seattle University School of Law" and in the box right above the photo on the ticket it has an address specifically for the law school. Should have the information there.
Hello, once you have a master chain indicating the relationships, this is our working substitute for writing out every possibility. We simply do not have enough time to write out every possibility on a game like this. Sometimes, we do have that ...
I believe the hidden inference here is that whatever is between the A and C must be the consecutive XX attribute pieces. This is how I would set this up:
A double layer sequencing game. The top row being the A-E pieces and ...
> @tringo335 said:
> A hooded dryer and some setting lotion for my hair LOL ... boring but necessary since I just chopped off all my hair for 2018 #newyearnewstyle
LOL I love this...(Sally's has magnetic rollers on sale)
I'm not sure I can give a tip that will "fix" things, but something I noticed for logic games is that the inferences that make the game work are always 1 step deeper. What I mean by that is something like a pyramid.
> @LSATcantwin said:
> I'm not sure I can give a tip that will "fix" things, but something I noticed for logic games is that the inferences that make the game work are always 1 step deeper. What I mean by that is something like a pyramid.
> @LCMama2017 said:
> > @LSATcantwin said:
> > I'm not sure I can give a tip that will "fix" things, but something I noticed for logic games is that the inferences that make the game work are always 1 step deeper. What I mean ...