HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| premise | 2.4K | 4.3K |
| sub | 735 | 1K |
| conclusion | 5.2K | 10.7K |
-
PT73.S2.Q12 - the chairperson should notI am trying to find a good explanation for answer choice A (correct) over answer choice D (incorrect) on PT.73 LR #1 , Q12. The stimulus states t…
... .
Conclusion: Shouldn't have been released
Premise: Didn't ... -
Conditional Reasoning; Relation to Premises and Conclusions?Hello Folks, I posted this in the powerscore forum as well, but it looks a little dead over there. I was hoping I might be able to pick someone's …
... suggests that because:
Premise 1: /NEOR --------> SVG (I ... as noted above)
Premise 2: /SVG
Conclusion: NEOR
premise=sufficient condition and that a conclusion=necessary condition ... -
PT22.S4.Q19 - contemporary business firmsI could not find anything to prove the conclusion > few people understand current events> and did not see the flaw the LSAT makers identified. He…
... find anything to prove the conclusion > few people understand current ... a premise I took it to be true. The conclusion jumped and ... nothing sufficient to prove the conclusion. Wasn't that the flaw ... -
PT73.4.19 and PT34.2.2 (please help)Hi guys, I am having trouble understanding JY's reasoning behind choosing correct answers in the above problems. PT73.4.19 is a necessary assump…
... sufficient assumption question, and their premise - conclusion reasoning is essentially identical:
Curvebreaker PSA Question ExplanationHello fellow December test-takers! I'm brushing up on PSA questions for this Saturday, and I came across a question that I think is an excellent lear…
... points the precise premise to the precise conclusion in a pretty ... when figuring out what the conclusion of the argument is, ... connecting the premises to THAT conclusion, and not just repeating ... clearer understanding of what the conclusion of the argument is, ...report sub-par GRE when had positive response by not including it?I applied to HLS with 25% LSAT and received an interview request. HLS later in the admissions cycle clarified that people who have taken both LSAT an…
... unsure and concerned that reporting sub-par GRE that I took ...Inference Vs ConclusionHi, I am facing difficulty in a particular type of Logical Reasoning question which asks to identify the correct inference of a passage and where one…
... the answer choices is a conclusion.I have a confusion to ... identify which one is a conclusion and which one is an ... the difference between Inference and Conclusion?When does "As are B" = "All As are B" and when does it mean "As generally are B"Is there any rule of the English language that allows us to tell when the claim "As are B" means every single A is a B, and when "As are B" is a gene…
... conclusion says that "criminal organizations will try...."
But the premise ... become involved. But the conclusion here is "criminal organizations ... organizations. So the conclusion technically is still not ... is by reading the conclusion as giving us ...Getting confused with "furthermore".I can't recall if further more was one of our indicator words. I am getting confused, does furthermore introduced the main conclusion and follow the …
I can't recall if further more was one of our indicator words. I am getting confused, does furthermore introduced the main conclusion and follow the main premise?PT12.S1.Q24 - Until recently it was thought that ink usedI am having trouble understanding why A is the right answer. P: Ink from Bible by Gutenberg contains titanium. Ink of another bible from 15th Cen…
... Century)
Conclusion: This finding supports (1) ... /> In arriving the first conclusion, the author is making ... conclusion follows well. The second conclusion is based on the premise ... restricted) from this conclusion? The premise is talking about one ...I’m redoing the CC, is there any point in taking another diagnostic after a year+ break from studyinI quickly went thru the CC last year over the summer before my senior year of undergrad and did an awful job at it. Didnt take it seriously, didn’t r…
... like of course I know premise/conclusion.
I stopped studying ... there are in just identifying premise/conclusion.
I think my ...PT15.S3.Q19 - The club president had no right to disallow Jeffrey's vote.According to the stimulus, the club president has disallowed Jeffrey to vote. Thomas is arguing that that was in violation of club rules. <Struct…
... club rules.
Premise 1: Rule: Vote --> Good ...
Premise 2: Jeffrey is a good standing member
Conclusion: The ... flaw. Because in reaching the conclusion, Thomas mistakenly assumed the club ...PT2.S2.Q14 - the "suicide wave"**PT2 S2 Q14** Type of question: WEAKEN Correct me if I am wrong in any part of my explanation. **Premise(s)** Oct. 1929 suicides due …
... of my explanation.
**Premise(s)**
Oct. 1929 ... Stock market flourishing
**Conclusion**
Stock market crash ... /> **Answer B** NO. This strengthens conclusion.
**Answer C** YES ...Are MSS Qs Basically About Finding A Conclusion In The Answer Choices?So I was doing a MSS Question, specifically: LSAT Preptest 20, Section 1, Question 1 After reading the stimulus, I went to the answer choices. …
... I felt made a reasonable conclusion, given the set of premises ...LR Conclusion Question.For Lr Questions such as this in which the conclusion has a conditional statement. <font color="red">**Admin edit: do not post the actual LSAT qu…
... as this in which the conclusion has a conditional statement.
PT54.S4.Q22 - The short-term and long-term interestsI don’t get it. AC B looks to be necessary but not sufficient. A->(B-most->C) Therefore B<-some->D AC B gives us C<-some->D Which allows u…
... which is found in the conclusion and A was intuitively wrong ... we were to change the premise to C-most->B ...can someone help me with clarifying the concept of "attacking a premise"Now I'm very confused about "attacking a premise" JY mentioned that LSAT weakening answer choices never provide plausible evidence that is incompati…
... very confused about "attacking a premise"
JY mentioned that LSAT ... relationship, is actually attacking a premise.
Did I miss ...PT16.S3.Q17 - Silencing DeviceQuestion type: Explain Premise: 1. There's a new silencing device that eliminate the noise the appliance makes 2. It's different from conventio…
Question type: Explain
Premise:
1. There's a ... from conventional silencers.
Conclusion:
1. The new device ...PT50.S4.Q12 - Researcher: A number of studies have suggestedCan anyone giveme a hand with this question? PREMISE: Studies suggest that no matter what type of short term therapy one receives one will ha…
... hand with this question?
PREMISE:
Studies suggest that no ... similar amount of improvement
CONCLUSION:
Therefore, it must be ...how long take you -0/-1 in LR? Help please!! (updated)Hey all, (heads up: many words in this remark, but thanks so much in advance for reading and taking the time to help! i really appreciate it and a…
... read the stimulus, identify conclusion and premise, and then try to identify ...What I wish somebody had told me on the journey for a 170+Started in or are sub 160: Get a course like 7sage, Manhattan, or some good resources like LSAT Trainer and LG bible, LR bible and self study(I'm all…
Started in or are sub 160: Get a course like ... think drilling is great for sub 160 but not later. Have ... section. Forgot to label a conclusion? Probably why you got it ...Logical Reasoning: StatisticsAfter combing through numerous tests looking for ways to improve my logical reasoning score, I isolated a concept throughout the preptests that I was…
... problems, if the conclusion says that the change ... br /> **Is the premise representative of the conclusion?**
Representativeness is ... for the premise to be representative of the conclusion? Well ... it means the conclusion should not ...My (long) LSAT Journey...Hi everyone! I hope you are all doing well. I have been meaning to write this for a while now; however, I got very busy with exams. Now that …
... LR and wrote down the conclusion, premise(s), wrong answer choice explanation ...PT69.S4.Q21 - If Skiff's book is published this yearOkay people, this is probably one of the hardest LR questions I've ever done, but also why I like talking about it. It's also why I think learning to…
... in the fact that the conclusion is a conditional statement with ... ; C. We are given a premise in the form of P ... variable tacked on in the conclusion. It's pretty worthless as ... conclusion is placed in the argument. It jumps out as a premise ...Can someone give me a scenario of a flaw that looks like this?One that, "appeals to a premise one would accept only if one already accepted the truth of the conclusion." I know there is a circularity in it, but …
One that, "appeals to a premise one would accept only if one already accepted the truth of the conclusion." I know there is a circularity in it, but can someone give an example, in non-abstract lsat language for me? That would be amazing lol thanks!!!!!!!PT60.S1.Q11 - Most universities today offer studentsIn this strengthening question, the conclusion that most universities offer a cosmopolitan and in depth education is supported by the premise that mo…
In this strengthening question, the conclusion that most universities offer a ... education is supported by the premise that most universities have history ...PT80.S1.Q19 - Politician: Of the candidates running, ThompsonI have some questions about this Q. Some of the information I'm presenting about this question I've only understood after reading forum boards (I don…
... hold and then makes his conclusion based on that opinion.
1) Is the first premise of the argument a comparative ...Wondering about "+/- an argument = +/- the support between P and C"I find that in some strengthen/weaken questions, the right answers are some "other consideration" that influence the conclusion, but are irrelevant t…
... " that influence the conclusion, but are irrelevant to premise. Consider this weaken ... /weaken the support that premise giving to conclusion, but strengthen/weaken the ...Differentiation between premise and contextHow do you differentiate between the context and the premise? Do you always have to have a premise indicator in order to have a premise?
How do you differentiate between the context and the premise? Do you always have to have a premise indicator in order to have a premise?
