HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 1 | 27.1K | 40.9K |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 3 | 22.5K | 32.2K |
| question | 29.2K | 48.6K |
| 06 | 164 | 178 |
-
"All that is required" Sufficiency or Necessity indicator?I understand that "ALL" is a sufficiency indicator word, and "REQUIRE" is a necessity indicator word. I'm wondering then, what does the phrase "*…
... : EJ-->ROW)
[ PT 15, Section 3, Question 7].
Knowing E ... -
PT57.S3.Q6 - Economist: As should be obviousHi everyone. Has anyone worked this question? If so, could you explain to me why D is incorrect? It's supposed to be an easy question being in the ea…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-57-section-3-question-06/
The title says ... it's "#3," so could you maybe edit ... -
Finding the ConclusionHi all, in this passage, is the conclusion the first sentence?
@BlueRiceCake sorry about that: PrepTest 1 - Section 3 - Question 13 -
I do not understand this answercan someone help? I don't see a distinction between both levels of oxygen
hello!
preptest 1 section 3 question 11 -
The phrase "even if" on LRWhen sentences start with "Even if" or "Even when" or "Even though", I've had a bit of trouble parsing out why LSAT writers put the word "even" there…
... role in the argument? PT 46 section 3 question 24 has even if in ... -
PT 46 S4 Game 3 Question# 12<i>Hey 7Sagers, had someone email me with a question and I thought you guys could help out! Here it is:</i> I have a question or comment regar…
... regarding LSAT 46, game 3, section 4, question 12. The game ask ... J=5; L = 1, 2, 4; N =1,2, 4, and ... O = 1,2,4,5< ... br />
For order choices question 12 ... a factor to answer this question. In addition, the rules ... -
PT.60.S3.Q3 - building permit cannot be obtained by Feb 1I'm literally SO confused about this question. How are you supposed to diagram this? From my understanding, "Unless A --> NOT B" is equivalent to…
... SO confused about this question. How are you ... equivalent to...."-obtained my Feb 1 OR -less time --> ... format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question"**
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-03 ... -
The secret to do tough Weaken/strengthen questionToday I have a big progress in weaken/strengthen question. I find in most weaken/strengthen question, there exists a presumption and the only thing…
... /lsat-37-section-2-question-20/
PT 52 S3 Q19
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section-3-question ... PT 52 S1 Q21.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section-1-question ... for strengthen/weaken question, we can have ... -
PT 1-35 as Drills or PTI'm familiar with question types and general approaches to different questions from previous study. I wonder if it makes more sense to do PT 1-35 as …
I'm familiar with question types and general approaches to ... sense to do PT 1-35 as timed 4-section tests, instead of ... wasted the full length tests 1-35. Please let me know ... -
LSAT Prep Test 32, October, 2000, Section 3, Questions 19-24, Game 4, Rule 2LSAT Prep Test 32 October, 2000 Section 3, Questions 19-24 Game 4 2nd Rule States That G Is In Slot 1, So G Cannot Be In Slot 7. Contrpos…
... />
October, 2000
Section 3, Questions 19-24
1, So G Cannot Be In ... Is Not In Slot 1.
Question: Why Is Not A ... Slot 7, But Not In 1? -
How useful is the LR from PT 1-16?Hey everyone, So I am mainly drilling sections PT 1-35 for the next couple months before PT stage. I drilled a LR section from PT 1 and found it …
... I am mainly drilling sections PT 1-35 for the next couple ... months before PT stage. I drilled a LR section from PT 1 and found ... it to be really weird. The question ... focusing on 1-16?
Sorry if this question has been ... -
[Study Guide]: Principle Question SubtypesFor those of you on the PT 55 BR call -- sorry it took me so long to get this up, but below are my notes on Principle questions and subtypes. Please …
... of you on the PT 55 BR call -- sorry ... LSAT.
1. Sufficient Assumption
-Supply additional ... with caution.
-PT52, Section 3, Question 11 provides an apt example ... —-> Specific
Question stem: “Of the following, which ... -
How to select an experimental section to add to a full PT?Hey 7sagers, I'm wondering from what sample of experimental sections you guys select to simulate a real LSAT exam. Do you choose them from earlie…
... you choose them from earlier PT's (1~40's) or do ... (e.g. Full PT 71+ PT 65 Section 3 as an experimental section)?
PT into experimental sections would be ... loss of a full recent PT.
What do you ... -
Road to 170+: Blind Review Bootcamp (Free tutoring session PT 65 Section 1 March 7th 3pm Eastern)Hi Folks: Some of you may not know how to properly blind review. What better way to learn than from a seasoned LSAT Sage? Or perhaps you just wan…
... as we blind review PT 65 LR Section 1 next Saturday
PT 65 LR Section 1 LR
What ... to prepare:
Complete PT 65 Section 1 but DO NOT mark it ... -
A confusion relates to Lawgic and Sufficent Assumption QuestionsI am very confused with a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes annoying in Assumpt…
... basically this is it:
1. "A-->C + A ... />
For example, PT 24, LR2, Section 3, Question 19. Sufficient Assumption.
1. "Do not go home ... Part-time jobs.
3. Do not go home ... take the contrapositive of 3, we have "No ... -
A specific Lawgic Confusion and Assumption QuestionsI am very confused with a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes annoying in Assumpt…
... basically this is it:
1. "A-->C + A ... />
For example, PT 24, LR2, Section 3, Question 19. Sufficient Assumption.
1. "Do not go home ... Part-time jobs.
3. Do not go home ... take the contrapositive of 3, we have "No ... -
Logic Chain (ish) questionHello, I've got a common question about linking up a logic chain. I just re-watched the video lesson but it's not precisely the answer to my questio…
... /> I've got a common question about linking up a logic ... precisely the answer to my question. Any help is appreciated!
My question is from PT 47 section 3, number 21. According to ... -
PT 1.S1.Q26 (P4) - outside the medical professionhttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-1-section-1-passage-4-questions/ I'm reviewing RC heavy, and I got stuck on this question, specifically an…
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-1-section-1-passage-4-questions/
... I got stuck on this question, specifically answer choice A (I ... -
PT 26 - "susceptible to proof" meaningHey all, What does the phrase "susceptible to proof" mean? The context is an answer choice for a LR question, "A reasoning error in the argument i…
... answer choice for a LR question, "A reasoning error in the ... ."
This is Section 3, Question 10, PT 26 for your reference.
PT47.S3.Q19 - although high cholesterol levels (wording question)http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-47-section-3-question-19/ When you encounter the word "contributes" on the LSAT, do you take this to be a "c…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-47-section-3-question-19/
When you encounter ... always have assumed so, but PT 47, S3, Q19 threw me ...63.3.2 Artist: Almost everyoneI got this question correct (D was the flaw I anticipated), but during the exam and BR, I couldn't come up with a reason to eliminate E. According t…
I got this question correct (D was the flaw ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-63-section-3-question-02/
Almost everyone ... have to wake up until 1:00) vs. making a "living ...Relative Support: An Observation/Potential New TrendProps to the BR Group on this, I really kinda just stole this observation from those guys! So there are two questions in PT 78 where it really fee…
... there are two questions in PT 78 where it really feels ... of right answer choices: Section 1 Question 6 and Section 3 Question 7. On both of ... for if anyone challenged a question or something. But on the ...PT68.S3.Q24 - in the riverview buildingI am not sure why answer choice D in question 68 section 3 of PT 68 is incorrect. Here is an explanation for why I think D can be considered the corr…
... answer choice D in question 68 section 3 of PT 68 is incorrect. Here ... contrapositive of conclusion (assumption #1):
Premises: 1. A --> B
1 and conclusion (assumption #1):
Premises: 1. dog --> ...PT17.S3.Q22 - on saturday melvin suggestedHi all! I had a question on answer choice E with this one. To me, the reasoning of flaw in answer choice E was the same as that of answer choice D…
... choice D of the same PT same section question 20.
Looking ... this passage was:
1. Skeptics have objected (...) by providing ... -17-section-3-question-22/
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-17-section-3-question-20 ...Conditional Reasoning; Relation to Premises and Conclusions?Hello Folks, I posted this in the powerscore forum as well, but it looks a little dead over there. I was hoping I might be able to pick someone's …
... 's brain about a particular question.
Hello ...
So, my question stems from question 2 of chapter 6 ... I believe this is from PT 31 Section 3 Number 22.
Premise 1: /NEOR --------> SVG (I ...What PT's are used for LR Drilling?Hey 7sagers, I have started to focus on doing individual untimed/timed sections and question type drilling to tackle Logical Reasoning. I've save…
... untimed/timed sections and question type drilling to tackle ... PT 50~80+ for full time PT's and dedicated PT 1~ ... 49 for drilling (QT+ Sections). More specifically, I have designated PT 1 ... ~20 for question type drilling and PT 21~49 for section ...Curvebreaker PSA Question ExplanationHello fellow December test-takers! I'm brushing up on PSA questions for this Saturday, and I came across a question that I think is an excellent lear…
... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-68-section-3-question-12/) and a link ... second. An analogous PSA question is PT 67 S4Q08, regarding ... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-67-section-4-question-08/
question comes in: PRECISION. Especially ...Positive correlation or causation?I was going through PT 47 and wanted some clarification on phrases. Section 1 Q23 of PT47 uses the phrase "accompanied by" and this indicates posi…
... through PT 47 and wanted some clarification on phrases.
Section 1 ... correlation.
However, in section 3 of the same test Q19 ... -47-section-3-question-19/
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-47-section-1-question-23 ...[Locked] "Associated with" vs. "accompanied by"Has anyone else noticed a difference in these two phrases? I was working on PT 47 and "accompanied by" seems to indicate correlation while "assoc…
... />
I was working on PT 47 and "accompanied by" seems ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-47-section-1-question-23/
S3 Q ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-47-section-3-question-19/Logical Reasoning: StatisticsAfter combing through numerous tests looking for ways to improve my logical reasoning score, I isolated a concept throughout the preptests that I was…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-46-section-3-question-22/
Our possibilities ... -30-section-4-question-22/
PT 34
"A group of 1,000 ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-31-section-3-question-09/
What are ...
