HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 1 | 27.1K | 40.9K |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 3 | 22.5K | 32.2K |
| question | 29.2K | 48.6K |
| 07 | 252 | 271 |
-
The secret to do tough Weaken/strengthen questionToday I have a big progress in weaken/strengthen question. I find in most weaken/strengthen question, there exists a presumption and the only thing…
... /lsat-37-section-2-question-20/
PT 52 S3 Q19
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section-3-question ... PT 52 S1 Q21.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section-1-question ... for strengthen/weaken question, we can have ... -
How to study for the 3rd Retake???I dreamed about getting a JD in the US before I came here but I didn’t dare to even look at a LSAT question because I wasn’t that confident in Englis…
... PTs in July. I did 3 PTs a week. At ... all 78 available PTs (PT 1-73, ABC, June 07, Feb 97). But ... about cancelling during the first section. I barely finished them ... , -6 in RC and -3 in each LR. I decided ... I would just focus one question type.
I ... -
PT 1-35 as Drills or PTI'm familiar with question types and general approaches to different questions from previous study. I wonder if it makes more sense to do PT 1-35 as …
I'm familiar with question types and general approaches to ... sense to do PT 1-35 as timed 4-section tests, instead of ... wasted the full length tests 1-35. Please let me know ... -
LSAT Prep Test 32, October, 2000, Section 3, Questions 19-24, Game 4, Rule 2LSAT Prep Test 32 October, 2000 Section 3, Questions 19-24 Game 4 2nd Rule States That G Is In Slot 1, So G Cannot Be In Slot 7. Contrpos…
... />
October, 2000
Section 3, Questions 19-24
1, So G Cannot Be In ... Is Not In Slot 1.
Question: Why Is Not A ... Slot 7, But Not In 1? -
How useful is the LR from PT 1-16?Hey everyone, So I am mainly drilling sections PT 1-35 for the next couple months before PT stage. I drilled a LR section from PT 1 and found it …
... I am mainly drilling sections PT 1-35 for the next couple ... months before PT stage. I drilled a LR section from PT 1 and found ... it to be really weird. The question ... focusing on 1-16?
Sorry if this question has been ... -
[Study Guide]: Principle Question SubtypesFor those of you on the PT 55 BR call -- sorry it took me so long to get this up, but below are my notes on Principle questions and subtypes. Please …
... of you on the PT 55 BR call -- sorry ... LSAT.
1. Sufficient Assumption
-Supply additional ... with caution.
-PT52, Section 3, Question 11 provides an apt example ... —-> Specific
Question stem: “Of the following, which ... -
How to select an experimental section to add to a full PT?Hey 7sagers, I'm wondering from what sample of experimental sections you guys select to simulate a real LSAT exam. Do you choose them from earlie…
... you choose them from earlier PT's (1~40's) or do ... (e.g. Full PT 71+ PT 65 Section 3 as an experimental section)?
PT into experimental sections would be ... loss of a full recent PT.
What do you ... -
Road to 170+: Blind Review Bootcamp (Free tutoring session PT 65 Section 1 March 7th 3pm Eastern)Hi Folks: Some of you may not know how to properly blind review. What better way to learn than from a seasoned LSAT Sage? Or perhaps you just wan…
... as we blind review PT 65 LR Section 1 next Saturday
PT 65 LR Section 1 LR
What ... to prepare:
Complete PT 65 Section 1 but DO NOT mark it ... -
PT35.S4.Q7 - mr. smith has a violent characterhttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-35-section-4-question-07/ This question asks us to identify a flaw. Attorney: I ask you to find Mr.Smith gu…
... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-35-section-4-question-07/
This question asks us to ... .
Three obvious flaws:
1. smith didn't refute doesn ... be a one-time thing. 3. even if smith is violent ... -
A confusion relates to Lawgic and Sufficent Assumption QuestionsI am very confused with a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes annoying in Assumpt…
... basically this is it:
1. "A-->C + A ... />
For example, PT 24, LR2, Section 3, Question 19. Sufficient Assumption.
1. "Do not go home ... Part-time jobs.
3. Do not go home ... take the contrapositive of 3, we have "No ... -
A specific Lawgic Confusion and Assumption QuestionsI am very confused with a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes annoying in Assumpt…
... basically this is it:
1. "A-->C + A ... />
For example, PT 24, LR2, Section 3, Question 19. Sufficient Assumption.
1. "Do not go home ... Part-time jobs.
3. Do not go home ... take the contrapositive of 3, we have "No ... -
Logic Chain (ish) questionHello, I've got a common question about linking up a logic chain. I just re-watched the video lesson but it's not precisely the answer to my questio…
... /> I've got a common question about linking up a logic ... precisely the answer to my question. Any help is appreciated!
My question is from PT 47 section 3, number 21. According to ... -
PT 1.S1.Q26 (P4) - outside the medical professionhttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-1-section-1-passage-4-questions/ I'm reviewing RC heavy, and I got stuck on this question, specifically an…
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-1-section-1-passage-4-questions/
... I got stuck on this question, specifically answer choice A (I ... -
PT 26 - "susceptible to proof" meaningHey all, What does the phrase "susceptible to proof" mean? The context is an answer choice for a LR question, "A reasoning error in the argument i…
... answer choice for a LR question, "A reasoning error in the ... ."
This is Section 3, Question 10, PT 26 for your reference.
PT47.S3.Q19 - although high cholesterol levels (wording question)http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-47-section-3-question-19/ When you encounter the word "contributes" on the LSAT, do you take this to be a "c…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-47-section-3-question-19/
When you encounter ... always have assumed so, but PT 47, S3, Q19 threw me ...63.3.2 Artist: Almost everyoneI got this question correct (D was the flaw I anticipated), but during the exam and BR, I couldn't come up with a reason to eliminate E. According t…
I got this question correct (D was the flaw ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-63-section-3-question-02/
Almost everyone ... have to wake up until 1:00) vs. making a "living ...Relative Support: An Observation/Potential New TrendProps to the BR Group on this, I really kinda just stole this observation from those guys! So there are two questions in PT 78 where it really fee…
... there are two questions in PT 78 where it really feels ... of right answer choices: Section 1 Question 6 and Section 3 Question 7. On both of ... for if anyone challenged a question or something. But on the ...PT68.S3.Q24 - in the riverview buildingI am not sure why answer choice D in question 68 section 3 of PT 68 is incorrect. Here is an explanation for why I think D can be considered the corr…
... answer choice D in question 68 section 3 of PT 68 is incorrect. Here ... contrapositive of conclusion (assumption #1):
Premises: 1. A --> B
1 and conclusion (assumption #1):
Premises: 1. dog --> ...PT17.S3.Q22 - on saturday melvin suggestedHi all! I had a question on answer choice E with this one. To me, the reasoning of flaw in answer choice E was the same as that of answer choice D…
... choice D of the same PT same section question 20.
Looking ... this passage was:
1. Skeptics have objected (...) by providing ... -17-section-3-question-22/
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-17-section-3-question-20 ...Conditional Reasoning; Relation to Premises and Conclusions?Hello Folks, I posted this in the powerscore forum as well, but it looks a little dead over there. I was hoping I might be able to pick someone's …
... 's brain about a particular question.
Hello ...
So, my question stems from question 2 of chapter 6 ... I believe this is from PT 31 Section 3 Number 22.
Premise 1: /NEOR --------> SVG (I ...What PT's are used for LR Drilling?Hey 7sagers, I have started to focus on doing individual untimed/timed sections and question type drilling to tackle Logical Reasoning. I've save…
... untimed/timed sections and question type drilling to tackle ... PT 50~80+ for full time PT's and dedicated PT 1~ ... 49 for drilling (QT+ Sections). More specifically, I have designated PT 1 ... ~20 for question type drilling and PT 21~49 for section ...Curvebreaker PSA Question ExplanationHello fellow December test-takers! I'm brushing up on PSA questions for this Saturday, and I came across a question that I think is an excellent lear…
... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-68-section-3-question-12/) and a link ... second. An analogous PSA question is PT 67 S4Q08, regarding ... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-67-section-4-question-08/
question comes in: PRECISION. Especially ...Positive correlation or causation?I was going through PT 47 and wanted some clarification on phrases. Section 1 Q23 of PT47 uses the phrase "accompanied by" and this indicates posi…
... through PT 47 and wanted some clarification on phrases.
Section 1 ... correlation.
However, in section 3 of the same test Q19 ... -47-section-3-question-19/
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-47-section-1-question-23 ...[Locked] "Associated with" vs. "accompanied by"Has anyone else noticed a difference in these two phrases? I was working on PT 47 and "accompanied by" seems to indicate correlation while "assoc…
... />
I was working on PT 47 and "accompanied by" seems ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-47-section-1-question-23/
S3 Q ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-47-section-3-question-19/Logical Reasoning: StatisticsAfter combing through numerous tests looking for ways to improve my logical reasoning score, I isolated a concept throughout the preptests that I was…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-46-section-3-question-22/
Our possibilities ... -30-section-4-question-22/
PT 34
"A group of 1,000 ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-31-section-3-question-09/
What are ...Are LR sections in PT 1-16 easier?I have been drilling LR sections for a while, and I used to have a -4/-6 for LR sections in PT 18-35. However, I began doing PT 1-16 four days ago, …
... .
However, I began doing PT 1-16 four days ago, and ... that I now have a -1/-3 for these older PTs (I ... /> I haven't got to PT 36-83 yet. Could anyone ... those PTs (as compared to PT 1-35)?
Thanks!LG PT 1-35 StrategyHi! I know everyone has different strategies for what works well for them for FP LG PT 1-35. I would love to hear others experiences in how they sa…
... for them for FP LG PT 1-35.
I would love ... the game sections.
1) How many games were you ... to get through each LG PT 1-35?
2) Did you ... needed more prep after 1-35?
3) What advice would you ...Cookie Cutter Review: Implicit CausationI want to quickly discuss a common type of causation argument that LSAC uses. Here is an example: **Those who wear glasses are more likely than…
... 4 possibilities :
1. A causes B
2 ... . B causes A
3. 3rd common cause
4 ... a correlation, there are 3 other possibilities which are equally ... /> PT 78 S3 Q21 (https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-78-section-3-question-21 ...PT43.S2.Q7-Failure to rotate cropsHow would you diagram the highlighted sentence. It has three conditional indicators ("if"- group 1 sufficient, "unless"- group 3 negate/sufficient an…
... indicators ("if"- group 1 sufficient, "unless"- group 3 negate/sufficient and "cannot ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-43-section-2-question-07/-1 to -3 on one LR and -8 on the nextHi everyone! Happy Friday. On my last few practice tests I have gotten between -1 to -3 on my first LR section and then, if LR shows up a second time…
... gotten between -1 to -3 on my first LR section and then, if ...
